Re: [PATCH] ext4: dir inode reservation V3

Coly Li
2007-11-13T16:35:21Z

Coly Li wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback :-)
>
> Alex Tomas wrote:
>> hmm. so you trade 265% degradation of creation for 40% improvement of
>> unlink?
>>
> 265% degradation is only for creating 50000 empty directories. This is not a common case.
> There are 13% improvement on create 15 files in each directories. Total time on creating these
> directories and files are 25m6s VS. 24m86s, indeed, dir inode reservation is a little faster.

Sorry a typo here, it's 25m6s VS. 24m7.86s.

>
> Maybe most of the people will not create dozens of empty directories in their applications,
> therefore IMHO the 265% degradation is acceptable.
>
> If user really need to create so many empty directories, they also can mount the file system without
> dir inode reservation to get better performance.
>
>> thanks, Alex
>>
>> Coly Li wrote:
>>> normal ext4 ext4 with dir inode reservation
>>> mount options: -o data=writeback -o
>>> data=writeback,dir_ireserve=low
>>> Create dirs: real 0m49.101s real 2m59.703s
>>> Create files: real 24m17.962s real 21m8.161s
>>> Unlink all: real 24m43.788s real 17m29.862s
>>> Creating dirs with dir inode reservation is slower than normal ext4 as
>>> predicted, because allocating
>>> directory inodes in non-linear order will cause extra hard disk
>>> seeking and block I/O. Creating
>>> files with dir inode reservation is 13% faster than normal ext4.
>>> Unlink all the directories and
>>> files is 29.2% faster as expected.
>>> When number of directories is increased, the performance improvement
>>> will be more considerable. More
>>> benchmark result will be posted here if necessary, because I need more
>>> time to run more test cases.
>

--
Coly Li
SuSE PRC Labs