From: Coly Li <coyli@suse.de>
To: Alex Tomas <bzzz.tomas@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: dir inode reservation V3
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 00:27:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4739D067.5080907@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4739B02A.2000209@gmail.com>
Thanks for the feedback :-)
Alex Tomas wrote:
> hmm. so you trade 265% degradation of creation for 40% improvement of
> unlink?
>
265% degradation is only for creating 50000 empty directories. This is not a common case.
There are 13% improvement on create 15 files in each directories. Total time on creating these
directories and files are 25m6s VS. 24m86s, indeed, dir inode reservation is a little faster.
Maybe most of the people will not create dozens of empty directories in their applications,
therefore IMHO the 265% degradation is acceptable.
If user really need to create so many empty directories, they also can mount the file system without
dir inode reservation to get better performance.
> thanks, Alex
>
> Coly Li wrote:
>> normal ext4 ext4 with dir inode reservation
>> mount options: -o data=writeback -o
>> data=writeback,dir_ireserve=low
>> Create dirs: real 0m49.101s real 2m59.703s
>> Create files: real 24m17.962s real 21m8.161s
>> Unlink all: real 24m43.788s real 17m29.862s
>> Creating dirs with dir inode reservation is slower than normal ext4 as
>> predicted, because allocating
>> directory inodes in non-linear order will cause extra hard disk
>> seeking and block I/O. Creating
>> files with dir inode reservation is 13% faster than normal ext4.
>> Unlink all the directories and
>> files is 29.2% faster as expected.
>> When number of directories is increased, the performance improvement
>> will be more considerable. More
>> benchmark result will be posted here if necessary, because I need more
>> time to run more test cases.
>
--
Coly Li
SuSE PRC Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-13 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-13 14:12 [PATCH] ext4: dir inode reservation V3 Coly Li
2007-11-13 14:09 ` Alex Tomas
2007-11-13 16:27 ` Coly Li [this message]
2007-11-13 16:43 ` Coly Li
2007-11-20 2:01 ` Mingming Cao
2007-11-20 4:14 ` Coly Li
2007-11-20 20:22 ` Mingming Cao
2007-11-21 2:09 ` Andreas Dilger
2007-11-20 15:58 ` Jan Kara
2007-11-20 16:40 ` Coly Li
2007-11-20 16:44 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4739D067.5080907@suse.de \
--to=coyli@suse.de \
--cc=bzzz.tomas@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox