public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Srinivasa Ds <srinivasa@in.ibm.com>
To: Abhishek Sagar <sagar.abhishek@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, prasanna@in.ibm.com,
	davem@davemloft.net, anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com,
	Jim Keniston <jkenisto@us.ibm.com>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] kprobes: Add user entry-handler in kretprobes
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 13:27:41 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <473AAA75.2050900@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <863e9df20711130247g45d3d541j10c76434e9c65b00@mail.gmail.com>

Abhishek Sagar wrote:
> On Nov 13, 2007 12:09 AM, Abhishek Sagar <sagar.abhishek@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Whoops...sry for the repeated email..emailer trouble.
> 
> Expecting this one to makes it to the list. Summary again:
> 
> This patch introduces a provision to specify a user-defined callback
> to run at function entry to complement the return handler in
> kretprobes. Currently, whenever a kretprobe is registered, a user can
> specify a callback (return-handler) to be run each time the target
> function returns. This is also not guaranteed and is limited by the
> number of concurrently pending return instances of the target function
> in the current process's context.
> 
> This patch will now allow registration of another user defined handler
> which is guaranteed to run each time the current return instance is
> allocated and the return handler is set-up. Conversely, if the
> entry-handler returns an error, it'll cause the current return
> instance to be dropped and the return handler will also not run. The
> purpose is to provide flexibility to do certain kinds of function
> level profiling using kretprobes. By being able to register function
> entry and return handlers, kretprobes will now be able to reduce an
> extra probe registration (and associated race) for scenarios where an
> entry handler is required to capture the function call/entry event
> along with the corresponding function exit event.
> 

If I understand your intentions(to capture information on function call/entry and corresponding function exit) cleary, I have few concerns on this.

1) How do you map the entry_handler(which gets executed when a process enters the function) with each instance of return probe handler.
I accept that entry_handler() will execute each time process enters the function, but to  calculate time, one needs to know corresponding instance of return probe handler(there should be a map for each return handler). 

  Let me explain briefly.
Suppose in a SMP system, 4 processes  enter the same function at almost sametime(by executing entry_hanlder()) and returns from 4 different locations by executing the return handler.  Now how do I match entry_handler() with corresponding instance of return handler for calculating time.

Sometime back, Even I was interested in calculating the  function execution time, but I used approach a) .

Now What I think is, there could be 2 solutions to these problem.

a) Collect the entry time and exit time and put it in that kretprobe_instance structure and fetch it before freeing that instance.

b) Or pass ri(kretprobe_instance address to entry_handler) and match it with return probe handler.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-14  7:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <47389BEB.1000901@gmail.com>
2007-11-12 18:39 ` [PATCH][RFC] kprobes: Add user entry-handler in kretprobes Abhishek Sagar
2007-11-13 10:47   ` Abhishek Sagar
2007-11-14  7:57     ` Srinivasa Ds [this message]
2007-11-14  8:49       ` Abhishek Sagar
2007-11-14 10:23         ` Srinivasa Ds
2007-11-14 13:30           ` Abhishek Sagar
2007-11-14 22:51             ` Jim Keniston
2007-11-15 13:16               ` Abhishek Sagar
2007-11-15 21:16                 ` Jim Keniston
2007-11-16 17:50                   ` Abhishek Sagar
2007-11-17  0:54                     ` Jim Keniston
2007-11-17 18:15                       ` Abhishek Sagar
2007-11-19 12:26                       ` Abhishek Sagar
2007-11-21  5:55                         ` Jim Keniston
2007-11-21 10:20                           ` Abhishek Sagar
2007-11-27  0:54                             ` Jim Keniston
2007-11-15 15:00               ` Abhishek Sagar
2007-11-16  0:07                 ` Jim Keniston
2007-11-16 18:53                   ` Abhishek Sagar
2007-11-16 23:09                     ` Jim Keniston
2007-11-17 17:09                       ` Abhishek Sagar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=473AAA75.2050900@in.ibm.com \
    --to=srinivasa@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jkenisto@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=prasanna@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=sagar.abhishek@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox