From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763003AbXKNSlP (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Nov 2007 13:41:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752487AbXKNSlA (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Nov 2007 13:41:00 -0500 Received: from gw.goop.org ([64.81.55.164]:58353 "EHLO mail.goop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752121AbXKNSk7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Nov 2007 13:40:59 -0500 Message-ID: <473B4132.5030402@goop.org> Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 10:40:50 -0800 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070727) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg KH CC: Linus Torvalds , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, LKML , Andi Kleen , Chris Wright , virtualization@lists.osdl.org, Andrew Morton , Keir Fraser , Stable Kernel Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH 00/12] xen/paravirt_ops patches for 2.6.24 References: <20071015204840.074767068@goop.org> <20071015215406.GA1588@kroah.com> <4713E2D6.90801@goop.org> <20071113232258.GA10338@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20071113232258.GA10338@kroah.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Greg KH wrote: > These don't apply now due to the x86 merge. Care to backport them and > send them to the stable@kernel.org address so we can apply them > properly? I'm a bit confused. The patches you mailed out are against arch/i386. Won't they apply to the stable tree as-is? > Although, it's not like anyone actually uses the in-kernel Xen on > 2.6.23, so it's probably not really worth it. > To be fair, those fixes were in response to bug reports raised on the released 2.6.23 kernel. But it isn't screamingly urgent. J