From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933068AbXKOUuW (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Nov 2007 15:50:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759439AbXKOUuJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Nov 2007 15:50:09 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:42576 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753139AbXKOUuH (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Nov 2007 15:50:07 -0500 Message-ID: <473CB03D.6000404@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 15:46:53 -0500 From: Chuck Ebbert Organization: Red Hat User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg KH CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org, Justin Forbes , Zwane Mwaikambo , "Theodore Ts'o" , Randy Dunlap , Dave Jones , Chuck Wolber , Chris Wedgwood , Michael Krufky , Domenico Andreoli , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, Dave Young , Greg KH , Jan Kiszka Subject: Re: [patch 04/13] param_sysfs_builtin memchr argument fix References: <20071115042610.731859958@mini.kroah.org> <20071115060927.GE7602@kroah.com> <473C6FCF.6010501@redhat.com> <20071115175810.GC24531@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20071115175810.GC24531@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/15/2007 12:58 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 11:11:59AM -0500, Chuck Ebbert wrote: >> On 11/15/2007 01:09 AM, Greg KH wrote: >>> -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. >>> >>> ------------------ >>> From: Dave Young >>> >>> patch faf8c714f4508207a9c81cc94dafc76ed6680b44 in mainline. >>> >>> If memchr argument is longer than strlen(kp->name), there will be some >>> weird result. >>> >>> It will casuse duplicate filenames in sysfs for the "nousb". kernel >>> warning messages are as bellow: >>> >> Needs an additional fix: >> >> Commit: 22800a2830ec07e7cc5c837999890ac47cc7f5de >> fix param_sysfs_builtin name length check > > That just went in yesterday, right? If so, it will have to wait until > the next -stable review cycle, unless it's totally broken without that > change. > > Is it? > Yeah, pretty much AFAICT. Maybe Jan can say exactly what happened, but it looks like the patch would cause more problems than it solves.