From: john cooper <john.cooper@third-harmonic.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Tim Bird <tim.bird@am.sony.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
john cooper <john.cooper@third-harmonic.com>
Subject: Re: MIPS RT debug support
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 20:55:49 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <473CF8A5.9030101@third-harmonic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0711151956430.30058@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Tim Bird wrote:
>
>> john cooper wrote:
>>> The more daunting problem stems from limitations in the MIPS
>>> ABI which makes the latency trace support problematic.
>>> Rather than rehash the issue:
>>>
>>> http://lists.linuxcoding.com/kernel/2005-q4/msg10163.html
>>>
>>> Until we have a usable instrumentation solution in place,
>>> characterization, debug, and support of PREEMPT_RT for MIPS
>>> is going to be a challenge.
>> Agreed. I have been using KFT (Kernel Function Trace)
>> on MIPS, and it has decent support for function traceback
>> reporting, but it's not currently integrated with latency-trace
>> at all. We should discuss if this could possibly be
>> used to debug RT-preempt. It is much heavier weight than
>> the mcount stuff, but uses similar (but not identical)
>> gcc profiling instrumentation. I'm not sure if the
>> two can be turned on together, or how hard it would
>> be to move latency-trace onto -finstrument_functions.
>
> I'm not familiar with the KFT but I'm sure it would be easy to port
> latency_trace to it. Really, all the mcount does is make a wrapper to pass
> to the trace calls.
It isn't an issue of getting a hook into the FUNCTION_PROLOGUE
(mcount() here) but rather of emulating the CALLER_ADDR[0123]
defs which map onto the gcc internal __builtin_return_address().
Doing so using the affectionately dubbed "Three Stooges Algorithm"
called out in the MIPS ABI is both complex and nondeterministic.
The entry FUNCTION_PROLOGUE hook provides a means to log the path
traveled thus far. __builtin_return_address() gives a way to
snapshot a stub of the stack invocation. Together they provide
somewhat complimentary but useful debug information.
We could log the stack invocation progress in the latency
instrumentation itself by noting a new invocation in the
FUNCTION_PROLOGUE and unwind of the same in the currently
unused FUNCTION_EPILOGUE hook. So we're just shadowing the
actual runtime stack in effect with a data structure which
can be traversed far more easily.
-john
--
john.cooper@third-harmonic.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-16 1:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-15 0:15 rt-preempt: problem compiling rt-preempt 2.6.23.1-rt11 on MIPS Tim Bird
2007-11-15 0:56 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-11-15 1:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2007-11-15 1:20 ` Tim Bird
2007-11-15 1:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2007-11-15 2:24 ` john cooper
2007-11-15 23:31 ` MIPS RT debug support Tim Bird
2007-11-16 1:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2007-11-16 1:55 ` john cooper [this message]
2007-11-16 2:25 ` Steven Rostedt
2007-11-16 11:56 ` john cooper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=473CF8A5.9030101@third-harmonic.com \
--to=john.cooper@third-harmonic.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tim.bird@am.sony.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox