From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751429AbXKRPPm (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Nov 2007 10:15:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752964AbXKRPP3 (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Nov 2007 10:15:29 -0500 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.184]:5137 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752868AbXKRPP3 (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Nov 2007 10:15:29 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=bjE2QHEAm/ghg6s82pmXRXbRvZ1Izjwt6QhJLBNLz3YKTMnoXYprAcOri+OiqOShcu6gOFO6vqgBGbikHKxgfCkSL1CjI/24NKNqpiYMRsgTyTIEX6s1mndvf1xzjl4l2BCi9byp8XJbKsEw0dh7Nt6coDMsAh3Zy07U3jbvir8= Message-ID: <4740570A.5030101@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 16:15:22 +0100 From: Jiri Slaby User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?IlJhZmHFgiBKLiBXeXNvY2tpIg==?= CC: Alan Stern , Andrew Morton , Greg KH , Kernel development list , Linux-pm mailing list Subject: Re: broken suspend [Was: 2.6.24-rc2-mm1] References: <200711181603.26522.rjw@sisk.pl> <474050EC.5080507@gmail.com> <200711181623.20029.rjwysocki@sisk.pl> In-Reply-To: <200711181623.20029.rjwysocki@sisk.pl> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/18/2007 04:23 PM, RafaƂ J. Wysocki wrote: > On Sunday, 18 of November 2007, Jiri Slaby wrote: >> On 11/18/2007 04:03 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> Can you also make the new System-map available, please? >> Sure: >> http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xslaby/sklad/System.map1 > > The last notifier called in http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xslaby/sklad/susp_hang2.png Last... Note, that it's only first 20 invokations of notifiers, there are bazillion of them when I remove the condition '< 20'. > is apparently cpu_swap_callback() which is not called in > http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xslaby/sklad/susp_hang1.png . > > Can you verify that cpu_swap_callback() gets called if the patch is not > applied? Does this still apply?