* Config Q?: Preempt Model & Preempt Big Kern Lock
@ 2007-11-18 22:46 Linda Walsh
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Linda Walsh @ 2007-11-18 22:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LKML
Not big deal, just some config-validity questions regarding
i386 preemption models and preemption of the big-kern lock.
I.e. the relevant options are:
(PM) "Preemption model", there are 3 choices (i386):
(none) No Forced Preemption (Server)
(vol) Voluntary Preempt (Desktop)
(full) Preemptible Kernel (Low-Latency Desktop)
(PBL) "Preempt The Big Kernel Lock" (hint: use Y for desktop, else N)
===
Are these all "valid" config states? Should they all be valid?
I.e., does it make sense to allow "PM==none && PBL==T" ?
Does it makes sense to allow "(PM==full) && PBL==F" ?
Is the issue of big-kernel-lock preemption of major consequence
these days, or should it work in all cases? Are there cases
where one might want PBL==F? Would they be limited to the
"PM=none" case?
Is this the right place or way to ask such questions, or to
get information?
In asking a similar information question, it seems that it
was preferred that a bug be filed. Is that the case here?
Thanks,
Lin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2007-11-18 22:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-11-18 22:46 Config Q?: Preempt Model & Preempt Big Kern Lock Linda Walsh
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox