public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Cc: zhengyi <goodmenkernel@gmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Is there any word about this bug in gcc ?
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 21:10:44 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47426C54.9020009@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071120041600.GC2472@hacking>

WANG Cong wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 10:13:42AM +0800, zhengyi wrote:
>> Is there any relevance to the kernel ?
>>
>> I found the folowing code here:
>> http://linux.solidot.org/article.pl?sid=07/11/19/0512218&from=rss
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>> int main( void )
>> {
>>  int i=2;
>>  if( -10*abs (i-1) == 10*abs(i-1) )
>>    printf ("OMG,-10==10 in linux!\n");
>>  else
>>    printf ("nothing special here\n") ;
>>
>>  return 0 ;
>> }
> 
> I think no. It is considered a bug in abs(), kernel, of course,
> doesn't use glibc's abs().
> 

Wrong.

abs() is internal to gcc, and the above is optimized out at compile 
time, so any user of abs() as a function at all is vulnerable.

However, the Linux kernel defines abs() as a macro:

#define abs(x) ({                               \
                 int __x = (x);                  \
                 (__x < 0) ? -__x : __x;         \
         })

... which means gcc never sees it.  So the kernel isn't affected, 
because it doesn't use *gcc's* abs().

	-hpa


  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-20  5:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-20  2:13 Is there any word about this bug in gcc ? zhengyi
2007-11-20  4:16 ` WANG Cong
2007-11-20  5:10   ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2007-11-20  5:39     ` WANG Cong
2007-11-20  6:03       ` Li Zefan
2007-11-20  6:10         ` WANG Cong
2007-11-20  6:04       ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-11-20  6:17       ` David Miller
2007-11-20  6:41         ` Herbert Xu
2007-11-20  6:47           ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-11-20  6:52             ` Herbert Xu
2007-11-20 12:52               ` Alessandro Suardi
2007-11-20 18:42                 ` Sami Farin
2007-11-20 21:10             ` Nix
2007-11-21 13:16               ` Alexander E. Patrakov
2007-11-21 16:19                 ` Alexander E. Patrakov
2007-11-21 17:22                   ` Lennart Sorensen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47426C54.9020009@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=goodmenkernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox