From: Zach Brown <zach.brown@oracle.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 5/6] Allow setting O_NONBLOCK flag for new sockets
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 10:24:38 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47432666.6070503@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <474323CA.9030306@zytor.com>
> That's only because you're being, deliberately or accidentally, vague
> about what your actual (as opposed to imagined) requirements are.
Maybe I can help by summarizing how syslets fit in to this.
Currently the syslet patches add a single submission call which includes
an argument which is a structure which duplicates the system call ABI.
The submission syscall in the kernel does some syslet specific work
which amounts to verifying state and storing it in the task_struct. It
then has to unpack the system call arguments from this submission
syscall argument and call the specified system call.
Every architecture will need helpers, then, on either side. They'll
need to pack their arguments into the struct and then unpack and call in
the kernel. The PPC64 guys have already expressed concern about this.
It's, in effect, adding the syslet arguments to every single system call.
So, instead of duplicating the system call ABI in the argument to a
syslet submission syscall, we could pass the syslet arguments via this
indirect parameters convention. This, hopefully, will reduce complexity
by reducing the number of places that we have to muck around with the
sycall ABI.
That's the high level summary, anyway. I'm working on the simplest
expression of this mechanism at the moment. We'll have code to argue
about before the silly thanksgiving break, I hope.
- z
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-20 18:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-20 6:53 [PATCHv4 5/6] Allow setting O_NONBLOCK flag for new sockets Ulrich Drepper
2007-11-20 7:59 ` David Miller
2007-11-20 16:04 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-11-20 18:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-11-20 18:24 ` Zach Brown [this message]
2007-11-20 19:12 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-11-20 22:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-20 22:33 ` Davide Libenzi
2007-11-20 22:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-20 23:25 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-11-20 23:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-20 23:57 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-11-26 18:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-11-26 18:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-26 19:07 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-11-26 19:55 ` Davide Libenzi
2007-11-26 19:20 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-11-26 23:25 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-11-27 0:14 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-11-27 0:42 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-11-27 1:23 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-11-27 2:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-11-27 2:38 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-11-20 21:48 ` David Miller
2007-11-20 21:55 ` Zach Brown
2007-11-20 22:36 ` David Miller
2007-11-20 17:54 ` Zach Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47432666.6070503@oracle.com \
--to=zach.brown@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox