public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>, Ian Wienand <ianw@gelato.unsw.edu.au>
Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] e100: free IRQ to remove warning when rebooting
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 15:23:16 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <474B5564.4090501@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47479260.7010101@garzik.org>

Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Ian Wienand wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> When rebooting today I got
>>
>> Will now restart.
>> ACPI: PCI interrupt for device 0000:00:03.0 disabled
>> GSI 20 (level, low) -> CPU 1 (0x0100) vector 53 unregistered
>> Destroying IRQ53 without calling free_irq
>> WARNING: at
>> /home/insecure/ianw/programs/git-kernel/linux-2.6/kernel/irq/chip.c:76
>> dynamic_irq_cleanup()
>>
>> Call Trace:
>>  [<a000000100014340>] show_stack+0x40/0xa0
>>                                 sp=e00000407c927b40 bsp=e00000407c920eb8
>>  [<a0000001000143d0>] dump_stack+0x30/0x60
>>                                 sp=e00000407c927d10 bsp=e00000407c920ea0
>>  [<a0000001000e58e0>] dynamic_irq_cleanup+0x160/0x1e0
>>                                 sp=e00000407c927d10 bsp=e00000407c920e70
>>  [<a0000001000106b0>] destroy_and_reserve_irq+0x30/0xc0
>>                                 sp=e00000407c927d10 bsp=e00000407c920e40
>>  [<a0000001000508f0>] iosapic_unregister_intr+0x5b0/0x5e0
>>                                 sp=e00000407c927d10 bsp=e00000407c920dd8
>>  [<a00000010000aa70>] acpi_unregister_gsi+0x30/0x60
>>                                 sp=e00000407c927d10 bsp=e00000407c920db8
>>  [<a00000010042e300>] acpi_pci_irq_disable+0x140/0x160
>>                                 sp=e00000407c927d10 bsp=e00000407c920d88
>>  [<a000000100774200>] pcibios_disable_device+0xa0/0xc0
>>                                 sp=e00000407c927d20 bsp=e00000407c920d68
>>  [<a0000001003778d0>] pci_disable_device+0x130/0x160
>>                                 sp=e00000407c927d20 bsp=e00000407c920d38
>>  [<a000000100525d20>] e100_shutdown+0x1c0/0x220
>>                                 sp=e00000407c927d30 bsp=e00000407c920d08
>>  [<a00000010037d0e0>] pci_device_shutdown+0x80/0xc0
>>                                 sp=e00000407c927d30 bsp=e00000407c920ce8
>>  [<a0000001004ecb70>] device_shutdown+0xf0/0x180
>>                                 sp=e00000407c927d30 bsp=e00000407c920cc8
>>  [<a0000001000ac4e0>] kernel_restart+0x60/0x120
>>                                 sp=e00000407c927d30 bsp=e00000407c920ca8
>>  [<a0000001000ac990>] sys_reboot+0x3b0/0x480
>>                                 sp=e00000407c927d30 bsp=e00000407c920c30
>>  [<a00000010000b4e0>] ia64_ret_from_syscall+0x0/0x20
>>                                 sp=e00000407c927e30 bsp=e00000407c920c30
>>  [<a000000000010620>] ia64_ivt+0xffffffff00010620/0x400
>>                                 sp=e00000407c928000 bsp=e00000407c920c30
>> Restarting system.
>>
>> I think the solution might be to free the IRQ before the
>> pci_device_shutdown
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ian Wienand <ianw@gelato.unsw.edu.au>
>>
>> ---
>>
>>  e100.c |    1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/e100.c b/drivers/net/e100.c
>> index 3dbaec6..8ae5ac3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/e100.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/e100.c
>> @@ -2782,6 +2782,7 @@ static void e100_shutdown(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>          pci_enable_wake(pdev, PCI_D3cold, 0);
>>      }
>>  
>> +    free_irq(pdev->irq, netdev);
>>      pci_disable_device(pdev);
>>      pci_set_power_state(pdev, PCI_D3hot);
> 
> agreed, though I think free_irq() should come after pci_disable_device()
> like it does in e100_suspend().
> 
> auke?

I actually think that's unintentional (the free_irq being after
pci_disable_device()) and possibly wrong. Looking at all our other drivers and
various others I see a consistent pattern of enable_device->enable_irq ->
free_irq->disable_device which makes much more sense to me since it's symmetric
and you can't enable irq's on a disabled device anyway.

So, I'd like to ACK this patch and I'll owe you a patch to fix the order up for
the e100_suspend code to change the order - but obviously I'll give that one a
test first.

Acked-by: Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>


Thanks,

Auke

      reply	other threads:[~2007-11-26 23:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-20  5:30 [PATCH] e100: free IRQ to remove warning when rebooting Ian Wienand
2007-11-20 17:11 ` [E1000-devel] [PATCH] e100: free IRQ to remove warning whenrebooting Brandeburg, Jesse
2007-11-24  2:54 ` [PATCH] e100: free IRQ to remove warning when rebooting Jeff Garzik
2007-11-26 23:23   ` Kok, Auke [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=474B5564.4090501@intel.com \
    --to=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
    --cc=e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=ianw@gelato.unsw.edu.au \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox