public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>
To: Larry Finger <larry.finger@lwfinger.net>
Cc: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Question regarding mutex locking
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 23:45:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <474DEF79.1080900@o2.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <474D8C22.7010902@lwfinger.net>

Larry Finger wrote, On 11/28/2007 04:41 PM:

> Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> writes:
>>
>>> If a particular routine needs to lock a mutex, but it may be entered with that mutex already locked,
>>> would the following code be SMP safe?
>>>
>>> hold_lock = mutex_trylock()
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>> if (hold_lock)
>>> 	mutex_unlock()
>> When two CPUs may enter the critical region at the same time, what is
>> the point of the mutex?  Also, the first CPU may unlock the mutex while
>> the second one is still inside the critical region.
> 
> Thank you for that answer. I think that I'm finally beginning to understand.

Probably it would be faster without these "...", which look like
no man's land...

hold_lock = mutex_trylock()
if (hold_lock) {
	/* SMP safe */
	...
 	mutex_unlock()
} else {
	/* SMP unsafe */
	...
	/* maybe try again after some break or check */
}

Regards,
Jarek P.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-28 22:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-28  4:37 Question regarding mutex locking Larry Finger
2007-11-28  8:10 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2007-11-28 14:46   ` Larry Finger
2007-11-28 15:00     ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2007-11-28 15:22 ` Andreas Schwab
2007-11-28 15:41   ` Larry Finger
2007-11-28 22:45     ` Jarek Poplawski [this message]
2007-11-28 22:56       ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-11-28 23:07         ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-11-28 23:33       ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-11-29  6:40         ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-11-30  1:13 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
     [not found] <fa.C9TdvYAhY8SablNc39IpD8WDnNM@ifi.uio.no>
2007-11-28  4:53 ` Robert Hancock
2007-11-28  5:19   ` Larry Finger
2007-11-29  2:34     ` David Schwartz
2007-11-29  7:56       ` Jarek Poplawski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=474DEF79.1080900@o2.pl \
    --to=jarkao2@o2.pl \
    --cc=larry.finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=schwab@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox