From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754760AbXLCF0b (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Dec 2007 00:26:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753567AbXLCF0V (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Dec 2007 00:26:21 -0500 Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.198.187]:35504 "EHLO rv-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751425AbXLCF0U (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Dec 2007 00:26:20 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=W6whML2YzZWb/6rzGaSOmFbcJUdqUH8lDGGNx/v6W3NeCYtAVCQz2k9CZG+xXkO+7+UGaMiOsYFYRpot2jfwrnL21ffRsb+2PkKj2DYB8sT6lv5CsaNpZ7Fw7CnKTwVqMAC8iLaoXW/0SFoaW1EnVStVa5Zh51K/5DEu4i7cX2M= Message-ID: <47539374.1090402@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2007 14:26:12 +0900 From: Tejun Heo User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070801) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , LKML , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Jeff Garzik , Alan Cox , Thomas Lindroth Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.23 References: <200712012312.42136.rjw@sisk.pl> <200712020347.01769.bzolnier@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200712020347.01769.bzolnier@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > On Saturday 01 December 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> Subject : 2.6.24-rc1: pata_amd fails to detect 80-pin wire >> Submitter : "Thomas Lindroth" >> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/7/152 >> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9322 >> Handled-By : Tejun Heo >> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz >> Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/11/115 > > Tejun's rework of cable detection code which fixes the problem has > been just applied into "upstream" (not "upstream-fixes") so it is > destined for 2.6.25 (I wasn't on cc: BTW) and since I got no feedback > on my patch (below) which also happens to fix the regression, was > acked by Alan, tested by Thomas and has been in -mm for 3 weeks now > I assume that everybody is happy with it (Jeff/Tejun: you were also > on cc: when the patch was merged into -mm).. I wasn't too sure about the fix because this doesn't deal with many cases where 40C cables are detected as 80C but it should definitely fix the specific regression && looks sane for #upstream too. Thanks. -- tejun