From: John Reiser <jreiser@BitWagon.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: slab quirks in DEBUG, ctor, and initialization
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 07:47:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47669A16.3010604@BitWagon.com> (raw)
In mm/slab.c, the DEBUG variant of cache_alloc_debugcheck_after
might call cachep->ctor(objp, cachep, 0); but the non-DEBUG
variant does absolutely nothing. idr_pre_get is a routine
which notices the difference.
Even when cache_alloc_debugcheck_after does invoke the ctor,
then it is conditional upon cachep->flags & SLAB_POISON . This
assumes that the only two states are poisoned and all-zero
(from .bss static, or via a cleared new page frame.)
So if SLAB_POISON is not specified, then a ctor which
does anything other than memset(,0,) is out of luck.
Instead: if a ctor is specified then it should be called
for each successful allocation.
Invoking the ctor from within cache_alloc_debugcheck_after makes it
awkward for a dynamic checker of allocations and initializations.
Valgrind would be happier if allocation and initialization were
invoked at the same subroutine nesting level, such as in __cache_alloc:
cache_alloc_debugcheck_before(cachep, flags);
local_irq_save(save_flags);
objp = __do_cache_alloc(cachep, flags);
/* checker marks the space as allocated */
local_irq_restore(save_flags);
objp = cache_alloc_debugcheck_after(cachep, flags, objp, caller);
if (objp && cachep->ctor)
cachep->ctor(objp, cachep, 0);
/* checker notes initializations during ctor [above] */
--
John Reiser, jreiser@BitWagon.com
next reply other threads:[~2007-12-17 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-17 15:47 John Reiser [this message]
2007-12-17 19:51 ` slab quirks in DEBUG, ctor, and initialization Pekka Enberg
2007-12-17 21:19 ` John Reiser
2007-12-17 21:55 ` Pekka J Enberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47669A16.3010604@BitWagon.com \
--to=jreiser@bitwagon.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox