From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>
To: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@us.ibm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
prasanna@in.ibm.com, anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com,
davem@davemloft.net, Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>,
systemtap-ml <systemtap@sources.redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: fix kprobe_handler reenable preemption
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:32:28 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <476890CC.1020100@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4768555A.3000604@redhat.com>
Hi
Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Fix a preemption bug in kprobe_handler(). It has to call preempt_enable()
> before returning.
> I think this is critical on preemptive kernel.
Sorry, this patch has a mistake.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Index: b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c 2007-12-18 12:51:00.000000000 -0500
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c 2007-12-18 12:53:38.000000000 -0500
> @@ -467,7 +467,8 @@
> arch_disarm_kprobe(p);
> regs->ip = (unsigned long)p->addr;
> reset_current_kprobe();
> - return 1;
> + ret = 1;
> + goto no_kprobe;
> #endif
> }
> /* We have reentered the kprobe_handler(), since
> @@ -481,7 +482,7 @@
> kprobes_inc_nmissed_count(p);
> prepare_singlestep(p, regs);
> kcb->kprobe_status = KPROBE_REENTER;
> - return 1;
> + ret = 1;
Here, "return 1;" is correct. After single step is done, preemption is enabled
in post_kprobe_handler().
> } else {
> if (*addr != BREAKPOINT_INSTRUCTION) {
> /* The breakpoint instruction was removed by
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu
Software Engineer
Hitachi Computer Products (America) Inc.
Software Solutions Division
e-mail: mhiramat@redhat.com, masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-19 3:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-18 23:18 [PATCH 1/2] x86: fix kprobe_handler reenable preemption Masami Hiramatsu
2007-12-19 3:32 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2007-12-19 10:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-19 16:03 ` Masami Hiramatsu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=476890CC.1020100@redhat.com \
--to=mhiramat@redhat.com \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=harvey.harrison@gmail.com \
--cc=jkenisto@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=prasanna@in.ibm.com \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=systemtap@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).