From: Steve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com>
To: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <bherren@au1.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
OpenFabrics General <general@lists.openfabrics.org>,
Wen Xiong <wenxiong@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [ofa-general] iommu dma mapping alignment requirements
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 13:29:41 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <476AC2A5.8060200@opengridcomputing.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <476ABE60.9030805@opengridcomputing.com>
Steve Wise wrote:
> Roland Dreier wrote:
>> > It appears that my problem boils down to a single host page of memory
>> > that is mapped for dma, and the dma address returned by dma_map_sg()
>> > is _not_ 64KB aligned. Here is an example:
>>
>> > My first question is: Is there an assumption or requirement in linux
>> > that dma_addressess should have the same alignment as the host address
>> > they are mapped to? IE the rdma core is mapping the entire 64KB page,
>> > but the mapping doesn't begin on a 64KB page boundary.
>>
>> I don't think this is explicitly documented anywhere, but it certainly
>> seems that we want the bus address to be page-aligned in this case.
>> For mthca/mlx4 at least, we tell the adapter what the host page size
>> is (so that it knows how to align doorbell pages etc) and I think this
>> sort of thing would confuse the HW.
>>
>> - R.
>
>
> In arch/powerpc/kernel/iommu.c:iommu_map_sg() I see that it calls
> iommu_range_alloc() with a alignment_order of 0:
>
>> vaddr = (unsigned long)page_address(s->page) + s->offset;
>> npages = iommu_num_pages(vaddr, slen);
>> entry = iommu_range_alloc(tbl, npages, &handle, mask
>> >> IOMMU_PAGE_SHIFT, 0);
>
> But perhaps the alignment order needs to be based on the host page size?
>
Or based on the alignment of vaddr actually...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-20 19:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-20 17:14 iommu dma mapping alignment requirements Steve Wise
2007-12-20 17:29 ` [ofa-general] " Tom Tucker
2007-12-20 18:07 ` Roland Dreier
2007-12-20 19:11 ` Steve Wise
2007-12-20 19:29 ` Steve Wise [this message]
2007-12-20 20:21 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-12-20 21:22 ` Steve Wise
2007-12-20 20:17 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-12-20 21:02 ` Steve Wise
2007-12-20 21:26 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-12-20 22:12 ` Steve Wise
2007-12-20 23:49 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-12-21 4:49 ` Steve Wise
2007-12-21 5:38 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=476AC2A5.8060200@opengridcomputing.com \
--to=swise@opengridcomputing.com \
--cc=bherren@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=general@lists.openfabrics.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
--cc=wenxiong@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox