public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>
To: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, qbarnes <qbarnes@gmail.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
	Jim Keniston <jkenisto@us.ibm.com>,
	davem@davemloft.net,
	Keshavamurthy Anil S <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Use is_kprobe_fault to better match usage
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2008 21:36:50 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <477C4A42.1010701@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1199322323.6323.76.camel@brick>

Hi Harvey,

Harvey Harrison wrote:
> Currently the notify_page_fault helper is used to test it the page
> fault was caused by a kprobe causing an early return from do_page_fault.
> 
> Change the name of the helper to is_kprobe_fault to match the usage and
> remove the preempt_disable/enable pair around kprobe_running() with an
> explicit test for preemption.  The idea for this comes from a patch
> by Quentin Barnes to kprobes.c

Sure, that's right.
However, since other architectures also have notify_page_fault(),
I think all of those code might better be changed same time for
maintainability.

Thanks,

> Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
> ---
> Ingo, this may not be functionally equivalent, feel free to yank it out
> if there is any trouble, but from what I've seen it should be OK.
> 
> Did you ever find a good kprobes test?
> 
>  arch/x86/mm/fault_32.c |   30 ++++++++++++++----------------
>  arch/x86/mm/fault_64.c |   30 ++++++++++++++----------------
>  2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault_32.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault_32.c
> index 051a4ec..5c48cc2 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/fault_32.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault_32.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
>  #include <linux/mman.h>
>  #include <linux/mm.h>
>  #include <linux/smp.h>
> +#include <linux/hardirq.h>
>  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>  #include <linux/init.h>
>  #include <linux/tty.h>
> @@ -42,23 +43,20 @@
>  #define PF_RSVD	(1<<3)
>  #define PF_INSTR	(1<<4)
>  
> -static inline int notify_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs)
> +static inline int is_kprobe_fault(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  {
> -#ifdef CONFIG_KPROBES
>  	int ret = 0;
> -
> -	/* kprobe_running() needs smp_processor_id() */
> -	if (!user_mode_vm(regs)) {
> -		preempt_disable();
> -		if (kprobe_running() && kprobe_fault_handler(regs, 14))
> -			ret = 1;
> -		preempt_enable();
> -	}
> -
> -	return ret;
> -#else
> -	return 0;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KPROBES
> +	/*
> +	 * If it is a kprobe fault we can not be premptible so return before
> +	 * calling kprobe_running() as it will assert on smp_processor_id if
> +	 * preemption is enabled.
> +	 */
> +	if (!user_mode_vm(regs) && !preemptible() && kprobe_running() &&
> +	    kprobe_fault_handler(regs, 14))
> +		ret = 1;
>  #endif
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
> @@ -428,7 +426,7 @@ void __kprobes do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code)
>  				return;
>  		}
>  #endif
> -		if (notify_page_fault(regs))
> +		if (is_kprobe_fault(regs))
>  			return;
>  		/*
>  		 * Don't take the mm semaphore here. If we fixup a prefetch
> @@ -437,7 +435,7 @@ void __kprobes do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code)
>  		goto bad_area_nosemaphore;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (notify_page_fault(regs))
> +	if (is_kprobe_fault(regs))
>  		return;
>  
>  	/* It's safe to allow irq's after cr2 has been saved and the vmalloc
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault_64.c
> index 97b92b6..09008e5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/fault_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault_64.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
>  #include <linux/mman.h>
>  #include <linux/mm.h>
>  #include <linux/smp.h>
> +#include <linux/hardirq.h>
>  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>  #include <linux/init.h>
>  #include <linux/tty.h>
> @@ -45,23 +46,20 @@
>  #define PF_RSVD	(1<<3)
>  #define PF_INSTR	(1<<4)
>  
> -static inline int notify_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs)
> +static inline int is_kprobe_fault(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  {
> -#ifdef CONFIG_KPROBES
>  	int ret = 0;
> -
> -	/* kprobe_running() needs smp_processor_id() */
> -	if (!user_mode(regs)) {
> -		preempt_disable();
> -		if (kprobe_running() && kprobe_fault_handler(regs, 14))
> -			ret = 1;
> -		preempt_enable();
> -	}
> -
> -	return ret;
> -#else
> -	return 0;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KPROBES
> +	/*
> +	 * If it is a kprobe fault we can not be premptible so return before
> +	 * calling kprobe_running() as it will assert on smp_processor_id if
> +	 * preemption is enabled.
> +	 */
> +	if (!user_mode_vm(regs) && !preemptible() && kprobe_running() &&
> +	    kprobe_fault_handler(regs, 14))
> +		ret = 1;
>  #endif
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
> @@ -478,7 +476,7 @@ asmlinkage void __kprobes do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs,
>  				return;
>  		}
>  #endif
> -		if (notify_page_fault(regs))
> +		if (is_kprobe_fault(regs))
>  			return;
>  		/*
>  		 * Don't take the mm semaphore here. If we fixup a prefetch
> @@ -487,7 +485,7 @@ asmlinkage void __kprobes do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs,
>  		goto bad_area_nosemaphore;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (notify_page_fault(regs))
> +	if (is_kprobe_fault(regs))
>  		return;
>  
>  	if (likely(regs->flags & X86_EFLAGS_IF))

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu

Software Engineer
Hitachi Computer Products (America) Inc.
Software Solutions Division

e-mail: mhiramat@redhat.com, masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com


  reply	other threads:[~2008-01-03  2:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-03  1:05 [PATCH] x86: Use is_kprobe_fault to better match usage Harvey Harrison
2008-01-03  2:36 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2008-01-03  3:00   ` Harvey Harrison
2008-01-03  3:20     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-01-03  9:38 ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=477C4A42.1010701@redhat.com \
    --to=mhiramat@redhat.com \
    --cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=harvey.harrison@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jkenisto@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=qbarnes@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox