From: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>
To: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-pci <linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>,
Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
"Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] PCIE ASPM support
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2008 11:33:29 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <477D3889.9070301@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1199340944.1642.26.camel@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com>
Shaohua Li wrote:
> PCI Express ASPM defines a protocol for PCI Express components in the D0
> state to reduce Link power by placing their Links into a low power state
> and instructing the other end of the Link to do likewise. This
> capability allows hardware-autonomous, dynamic Link power reduction
> beyond what is achievable by software-only controlled power management.
> However, The device should be configured by software appropriately.
> Enabling ASPM will save power, but will introduce device latency.
>
> This patch adds ASPM support in Linux. It introduces a global policy for
> ASPM, a sysfs file /sys/module/pcie_aspm/parameters/policy can control
> it. The interface can be used as a boot option too. Currently we have
> below setting:
> -default, BIOS default setting
> -powersave, highest power saving mode, enable all available ASPM state
> and clock power management
> -performance, highest performance, disable ASPM and clock power
> management
> By default, the 'default' policy is used currently.
>
> In my test, power difference between powersave mode and performance mode
> is about 1.3w in a system with 3 PCIE links.
>
> please review, any comments will be appreciated.
quickly glanced this over since I recently disabled l1 ASPM for the e1000/e1000e
driven 82573 device which has issues with l1 ASPM. that immediately gives me the
question: how can I continue to disable 1l aspm by default for this device using
this infrastructure?
I do like the fact that there is a generic way to re-enable it for the users who
want to use it. Can this change be done when the device is already active? Can you
change this parameter per device/module?
> + /* Clock PM state*/
> + unsigned int clk_pm_capable:1;
> + unsigned int clk_pm_enabled:1;
> + unsigned int bios_clk_state:1;
might want to get rid of these bitfields?
Cheers,
Auke
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-03 19:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-03 6:15 [RFC] PCIE ASPM support Shaohua Li
2008-01-03 19:33 ` Kok, Auke [this message]
2008-01-04 1:32 ` Shaohua Li
2008-01-07 18:19 ` Kok, Auke
2008-01-08 1:34 ` Shaohua Li
2008-01-07 22:02 ` Michael Ellerman
2008-01-08 1:35 ` Shaohua Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=477D3889.9070301@intel.com \
--to=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox