From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755178AbYAGGiR (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jan 2008 01:38:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753833AbYAGGh6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jan 2008 01:37:58 -0500 Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.182]:51818 "EHLO wa-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753806AbYAGGhw (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jan 2008 01:37:52 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=WdxSSDKRvz/cCSYdjchetiHog6cxlalfyCMiGhDb0NpzPCfTanAriO1gv3FAfkBBy3tbxZs9si6/b3zGFuNaNdFzAGVksMe35Z2DAvsMg43IvkVkXoYCANR5SqBKIajUBK38GuLBp4pd9V0ZrZXAdYd1OCVs7McljnrUVJ7jQJQ= Message-ID: <4781C8B5.6050207@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 15:37:41 +0900 From: Tejun Heo User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070801) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rusty Russell CC: James Bottomley , Jens Axboe , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] sg_ring: a ring of scatterlist arrays References: <200712191731.26512.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> <200801071538.58875.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> <4781B234.7070805@gmail.com> <200801071628.11381.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> In-Reply-To: <200801071628.11381.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Rusty Russell wrote: > On Monday 07 January 2008 16:01:40 Tejun Heo wrote: >>> But we hit the same problems: >>> >>> 1) sg_chain loses information. The clever chain packaging makes reading >>> easy, but manipulation is severely limited. You can append to your own >>> chains by padding, but not someone elses. This works for SCSI, but what >>> about the rest of us? And don't even think of joining mapped chains: it >>> will almost work. >> You can append by allocating one more element on the chain to be >> appended and moving the last element of the first chain to it while >> using the last element for chaining. > > Hi Tejun, > > Nice try! Even ignoring the ugliness of undoing such an operation if the > caller doesn't expect you to mangle their chains, consider a one-element sg > array. :( Heh heh, that can be dealt with by skipping the first chain if the first chain is empty after chaining. Please take a look at ata_sg_setup_extra() in the following. http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/tj/libata-dev.git;a=blob;f=drivers/ata/libata-core.c;h=32dde5bbc75ed53e89ac17040da2cd0621a37161;hb=c8847e473a4a2844244784226eb362be10d52ce9 That said, yeah, it's seriously ugly. Restoring the original sg is ugly too. I definitely agree that we need some improvements here. -- tejun