From: "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
To: acme@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
mingo@redhat.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com
Cc: Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com,
kan.liang@intel.com, yao.jin@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] perf tools: Fix pattern matching for same substring used in different pmu type
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 10:02:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4787334d-cf28-5b25-8d11-c767c52288f1@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <982714a5-8a5d-8f8a-4e30-bd9a497ffa40@linux.intel.com>
Hi Arnaldo, Jiri,
Any comments for this bug fix patch?
The issue does impact some uncore events and even some metrics.
Thanks
Jin Yao
On 6/11/2021 10:54 AM, Jin, Yao wrote:
> And, though this patch is to fix the uncore_imc/uncore_imc_free_running mismatching issue. We are
> also surprised to see it can solve another hybrid PMU issue on Alderlake.
>
> On Alderlake,
>
> # ./perf stat -e cpu/event=0xc2,umask=0x2/ true
>
> Performance counter stats for 'true':
>
> 702,246 cpu_core/event=0xc2,umask=0x2/
> <not counted> cpu_atom/event=0xc2,umask=0x2/
>
> It should error out with the wrong PMU rather than using 'cpu_core' and'cpu_atom' instead.
>
> This is still the pattern matching issue. The pattern is "cpu*". Both "cpu_core" and "cpu_atom" can
> match the pattern "cpu*", so the parser wrongly thinks they are the same PMU type.
>
> Now with this patch,
>
> # ./perf stat -e cpu/cpu-cycles/ true
> event syntax error: 'cpu/cpu-cycles/'
> \___ Cannot find PMU `cpu'. Missing kernel support?
> Run 'perf list' for a list of valid events
>
> Thanks
> Jin Yao
>
> On 6/9/2021 12:57 PM, Jin Yao wrote:
>> Some different pmu types may have same substring. For example,
>> on Icelake server, we have pmu types "uncore_imc" and
>> "uncore_imc_free_running". Both pmu types have substring "uncore_imc".
>> But the parser would wrongly think they are the same pmu type.
>>
>> We enable an imc event,
>> perf stat -e uncore_imc/event=0xe3/ -a -- sleep 1
>>
>> Perf actually expands the event to:
>> uncore_imc_0/event=0xe3/
>> uncore_imc_1/event=0xe3/
>> uncore_imc_2/event=0xe3/
>> uncore_imc_3/event=0xe3/
>> uncore_imc_4/event=0xe3/
>> uncore_imc_5/event=0xe3/
>> uncore_imc_6/event=0xe3/
>> uncore_imc_7/event=0xe3/
>> uncore_imc_free_running_0/event=0xe3/
>> uncore_imc_free_running_1/event=0xe3/
>> uncore_imc_free_running_3/event=0xe3/
>> uncore_imc_free_running_4/event=0xe3/
>>
>> That's because the "uncore_imc_free_running" matches the
>> pattern "uncore_imc*".
>>
>> Now we check that the last characters of pmu name is
>> '_<digit>'.
>>
>> Fixes: b2b9d3a3f021 ("perf pmu: Support wildcards on pmu name in dynamic pmu events")
>> Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> tools/perf/util/parse-events.y | 2 ++
>> tools/perf/util/pmu.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> tools/perf/util/pmu.h | 1 +
>> 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.y b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.y
>> index aba12a4d488e..7a694c7f7f1a 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.y
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.y
>> @@ -317,6 +317,8 @@ event_pmu_name opt_pmu_config
>> strncmp($1, "uncore_", 7))
>> name += 7;
>> if (!fnmatch(pattern, name, 0)) {
>> + if (!perf_pmu__valid_suffix($1, name))
>> + continue;
>> if (parse_events_copy_term_list(orig_terms, &terms))
>> CLEANUP_YYABORT;
>> if (!parse_events_add_pmu(_parse_state, list, pmu->name, terms, true, false))
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
>> index 88c8ecdc60b0..78af01959830 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
>> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
>> #include <linux/compiler.h>
>> #include <linux/string.h>
>> #include <linux/zalloc.h>
>> +#include <linux/ctype.h>
>> #include <subcmd/pager.h>
>> #include <sys/types.h>
>> #include <errno.h>
>> @@ -768,7 +769,7 @@ bool pmu_uncore_alias_match(const char *pmu_name, const char *name)
>> */
>> for (; tok; name += strlen(tok), tok = strtok_r(NULL, ",", &tmp)) {
>> name = strstr(name, tok);
>> - if (!name) {
>> + if (!name || !perf_pmu__valid_suffix(tok, (char *)name)) {
>> res = false;
>> goto out;
>> }
>> @@ -1872,3 +1873,25 @@ bool perf_pmu__has_hybrid(void)
>> return !list_empty(&perf_pmu__hybrid_pmus);
>> }
>> +
>> +bool perf_pmu__valid_suffix(char *tok, char *pmu_name)
>> +{
>> + char *p;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * The pmu_name has substring tok. If the format of
>> + * pmu_name is <tok> or <tok>_<digit>, return true.
>> + */
>> + p = pmu_name + strlen(tok);
>> + if (*p == 0)
>> + return true;
>> +
>> + if (*p != '_')
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + ++p;
>> + if (*p == 0 || !isdigit(*p))
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + return true;
>> +}
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/pmu.h b/tools/perf/util/pmu.h
>> index a790ef758171..ebfd2b71532b 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/pmu.h
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/pmu.h
>> @@ -133,5 +133,6 @@ void perf_pmu__warn_invalid_config(struct perf_pmu *pmu, __u64 config,
>> char *name);
>> bool perf_pmu__has_hybrid(void);
>> +bool perf_pmu__valid_suffix(char *tok, char *pmu_name);
>> #endif /* __PMU_H */
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-23 2:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-09 4:57 [PATCH v1] perf tools: Fix pattern matching for same substring used in different pmu type Jin Yao
2021-06-11 2:54 ` Jin, Yao
2021-06-23 2:02 ` Jin, Yao [this message]
2021-06-25 10:11 ` Jiri Olsa
2021-06-28 1:52 ` Jin, Yao
2021-06-29 21:15 ` Jiri Olsa
2021-06-29 21:47 ` Liang, Kan
2021-06-30 8:15 ` Jin, Yao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4787334d-cf28-5b25-8d11-c767c52288f1@linux.intel.com \
--to=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=yao.jin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox