From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761338AbYAKPDr (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:03:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759005AbYAKPDk (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:03:40 -0500 Received: from intcomgrp.com ([216.54.13.120]:35276 "EHLO beta.support.intcomgrp.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756716AbYAKPDj (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:03:39 -0500 Message-ID: <47878566.6050508@intcomgrp.com> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:04:06 -0500 From: James Kosin Organization: International Communications Group, Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: > 100% CPU usage Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Anyone remember the patch / patches done for the 2.6 series that related to top reporting > 100% CPU usage? I remember there was a series of patches addressing several clock related issues; but, don't remember the exact one for this issue. I'm going to have to get a memory upgrade and stop putting useful tidbits in temporary storage! James -- Scanned by ClamAV - http://www.clamav.net