linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/3] Latencytop instrumentations part 1
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:20:21 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47913435.4010004@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080118231109.GC27193@redhat.com>

Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> Hi -
> 
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 02:33:34PM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>> [...]
>>> Can you suggest of some reason why all this instrumentation could
>>> not be in the form of standard markers (perhaps conditionally
>>> compiled out if necessary)?
>> sure. Every instrumentation you see is of the nested kind (since the lowest level
>> of nesting is already automatic via wchan).
>> If markers can provide me the following semantics, I'd be MORE than happy to use markers:
>> [...]
>> If markers can provide that semantics ... you sold me.
> 
> Further to what acme said, markers are semantics-free.  Callback
> functions that implement your entry & exit semantics can be attached
> at run time, at your pleasure.  (So can systemtap probes, for that
> matter.)  The main difference would be that these callback functions
> would have manage the per-thread LIFO data structures themselves,
> instead of allocating backpointers on the kernel stack.  (Bonus marks
> for not modifying task_struct. :-)

modifying task struct to have storage space is no big deal...

  reply	other threads:[~2008-01-18 23:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-18 17:36 [Announce] Development release 0.1 of the LatencyTOP tool Arjan van de Ven
2008-01-18 17:39 ` [patch 1/3] LatencyTOP infrastructure patch Arjan van de Ven
2008-01-20 11:34   ` Helge Deller
2008-01-20 16:47   ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-01-20 17:18     ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-01-21  8:06   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-01-21 16:16     ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-01-18 17:40 ` [patch 2/3] Latencytop instrumentations part 1 Arjan van de Ven
2008-01-18 22:26   ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-01-18 22:33     ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-01-18 22:47       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2008-01-18 23:11       ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-01-18 23:20         ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2008-01-18 17:42 ` [patch 3/3] LatencyTOP instrumentations part 2 Arjan van de Ven
2008-01-18 18:27 ` [Announce] Development release 0.1 of the LatencyTOP tool Roberto Fichera
2008-01-18 18:35   ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-01-18 18:46     ` Roberto Fichera
2008-01-18 19:02 ` Zan Lynx
2008-01-19  5:07 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-19  5:16   ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-01-19  5:27     ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-19  5:25       ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-01-19  5:33         ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-19  5:34           ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-01-19  6:08             ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-19  5:37           ` [Announce] Development release 0.1 of the LatencyTOP tool II Andi Kleen
2008-01-21  0:52 ` Development release 0.1 of the LatencyTOP tool KOSAKI Motohiro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47913435.4010004@linux.intel.com \
    --to=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=fche@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).