From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757007AbYATXwS (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:52:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756194AbYATXwK (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:52:10 -0500 Received: from gw.goop.org ([64.81.55.164]:49978 "EHLO mail.goop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756161AbYATXwI (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:52:08 -0500 Message-ID: <4793DEA6.5070403@goop.org> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:52:06 -0800 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071115) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: xming CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Xen-devel Subject: Re: Cannot boot xen DomU > 2.6.23.1 References: <519a8b110801170813h96b8f2by795e6d8b72a00ba4@mail.gmail.com> <478F8D22.60004@goop.org> <519a8b110801171113y20a3bedfg446e29a30712a26d@mail.gmail.com> <4790561E.9040508@goop.org> <519a8b110801180438l389ec1d6t7b888b8c78d59dd8@mail.gmail.com> <4790D187.8050000@goop.org> <519a8b110801180856o7757889as47106fd3eabcc0de@mail.gmail.com> <4790E13D.5040603@goop.org> <519a8b110801200508l1fb3dee9ha197f3fc76ccac69@mail.gmail.com> <479394D9.50104@goop.org> <519a8b110801201129kd4347d5mf87920f69cf1821e@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <519a8b110801201129kd4347d5mf87920f69cf1821e@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org xming wrote: >> Thanks, that answers that particular question; the vcpu is blocked >> waiting for something to happen, which probably means it missed the >> event which was supposed to wake it up. Why is another question. At >> least there's a workaround, and that workaround gives me some clue where >> to look. >> > > Want me to test it? > I'll probably look at this when my current batch of work is under control. In the meantime, I'll submit the workaround patch to keep people happy. The only downside is a small performance hit. >> BTW, is it an SMP or UP domain? Does it make a difference? >> > > It doesn't matter, I tried vcpu=1 and vcpu=2, unless you want me to try > to recompile a UP kernel? > It would be an interesting datapoint, but I don't think it will make a difference. >> Maybe when I have nothing else to do. >> > > I'll wait, or should I poke xen-devel? > Poke xen-devel. J