From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: ignore spurious faults
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:26:31 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4797DB37.5040507@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1201133916.16972.124.camel@brick>
Harvey Harrison wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 16:05 -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>
>> ===================================================================
>> --- a/arch/x86/mm/fault_32.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault_32.c
>> @@ -290,6 +290,53 @@ static int is_errata93(struct pt_regs *r
>>
>>
>> /*
>> + * Handle a spurious fault caused by a stale TLB entry. This allows
>> + * us to lazily refresh the TLB when increasing the permissions of a
>> + * kernel page (RO -> RW or NX -> X). Doing it eagerly is very
>> + * expensive since that implies doing a full cross-processor TLB
>> + * flush, even if no stale TLB entries exist on other processors.
>> + * There are no security implications to leaving a stale TLB when
>> + * increasing the permissions on a page.
>> + */
>> +static int spurious_fault(unsigned long address,
>> + unsigned long error_code)
>> +{
>> + pgd_t *pgd;
>> + pud_t *pud;
>> + pmd_t *pmd;
>> + pte_t *pte;
>> +
>> + /* Reserved-bit violation or user access to kernel space? */
>> + if (error_code & (PF_USER | PF_RSVD))
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + pgd = init_mm.pgd + pgd_index(address);
>> + if (!pgd_present(*pgd))
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + pud = pud_offset(pgd, address);
>> + if (!pud_present(*pud))
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + pmd = pmd_offset(pud, address);
>> + if (!pmd_present(*pmd))
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + pte = pte_offset_kernel(pmd, address);
>> + if (!pte_present(*pte))
>> + return 0;
>> + if ((error_code & 0x02) && !pte_write(*pte))
>> + return 0;
>>
>
> if ((error_code & PF_WRITE) && !pte_write(*pte))
> return 0;
>
Oops, thanks. Overlooked that one.
> How about dropping the #if and rely on the !pte_exec() test always
> being false when _PAGE_NX = 0? The compiler should just trim this
> all away.
>
> from pgtable.h:
>
> static inline int pte_exec(pte_t pte) { return !(pte_val(pte)
> & _PAGE_NX); }
>
Thanks for reminding me; I thought of this the other day, but forgot to
do it. Will post an updated patch shortly.
J
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-24 0:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-24 0:05 [PATCH] x86: ignore spurious faults Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-24 0:18 ` Harvey Harrison
2008-01-24 0:26 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2008-01-24 0:28 ` [PATCH UPDATE] " Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-24 19:14 ` Matt Mackall
2008-01-24 19:21 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-24 23:41 ` Nick Piggin
2008-01-25 0:26 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-25 7:36 ` Keir Fraser
2008-01-25 8:15 ` Jan Beulich
2008-01-25 8:38 ` Nick Piggin
2008-01-25 9:11 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-25 9:18 ` Keir Fraser
2008-01-25 9:51 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-25 10:19 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-25 13:17 ` Keir Fraser
2008-01-25 9:18 ` Jan Beulich
2008-01-25 15:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-25 15:54 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-25 18:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-25 18:39 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-24 6:49 ` [PATCH] " Andi Kleen
2008-01-24 7:02 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-24 7:11 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4797DB37.5040507@goop.org \
--to=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=harvey.harrison@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox