linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarod Wilson <jwilson@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Cc: linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Kristian Høgsberg" <krh@redhat.com>,
	"Nick Piggin" <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] firewire: fw-core: react on bus resets while the config ROM is being fetched
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:11:38 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4798B8BA.9090203@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <tkrat.9c7056f105b7d6a9@s5r6.in-berlin.de>

Stefan Richter wrote:
> read_rom() obtained a fresh new fw_device.generation for each read
> transaction.  Hence it was able to continue reading in the middle of the
> ROM even if a bus reset happened.  However the device may have modified
> the ROM during the reset.  We would end up with a corrupt fetched ROM
> image then.
> 
> Although all of this is quite unlikely, it is not impossible.
> Therefore we now restart reading the ROM if the bus generation changed.
> 
> Side note:  The barrier in read_rom(), inserted by patch "firewire:
> enforce access order between generation and node ID" is not necessary
> anymore because the sequence of calls
> 	fw_device_init() ->
> 		read_bus_info_block() ->
> 			read_rom()
> 			read_rom()
> 			read_rom()
> 			...
> will take care that generation is read before node_id, won't it?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>

Based on a quick read through the code path, coupled with empirical evidence,
yes, it appears safe to remove the barrier in read_rom().

Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jwilson@redhat.com>

-- 
Jarod Wilson
jwilson@redhat.com


  reply	other threads:[~2008-01-24 16:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-01  1:49 [PATCH] firewire: fw-core: enforce write order when updating fw_device.generation Stefan Richter
2007-11-01  1:50 ` [PATCH] firewire: fw-core: react on bus resets while the config ROM is being fetched Stefan Richter
2007-11-01  1:51   ` [PATCH] firewire: fw-sbp2: enforce read order of device generation and node ID Stefan Richter
2007-11-01  3:53 ` [PATCH] firewire: fw-core: enforce write order when updating fw_device.generation Nick Piggin
2007-11-01  9:51   ` dealing with barriers (was Re: [PATCH] firewire: fw-core: enforce write order when updating fw_device.generation) Stefan Richter
2007-11-01 11:32     ` Nick Piggin
2008-01-24  0:52     ` [PATCH 0/4] firewire: order of memory accesses (bus generation vs. node ID) Stefan Richter
2008-01-24  0:53       ` [PATCH 1/4] firewire: fw-sbp2: use device generation, not card generation Stefan Richter
2008-01-24 16:04         ` Jarod Wilson
2008-01-24  0:53       ` [PATCH 2/4] firewire: fw-cdev: " Stefan Richter
2008-01-24 16:05         ` Jarod Wilson
2008-01-24  0:54       ` [PATCH 3/4] firewire: enforce access order between generation and node ID Stefan Richter
2008-01-24  4:55         ` Nick Piggin
2008-01-24 16:06         ` Jarod Wilson
2008-01-25 16:35           ` Stefan Richter
2008-01-25 17:57             ` Stefan Richter
     [not found]               ` <59ad55d30801251024j6ff43953tb86aaa52fdea5ec9@mail.gmail.com>
2008-01-25 22:25                 ` Stefan Richter
2008-01-24  0:55       ` [PATCH 4/4] firewire: fw-core: react on bus resets while the config ROM is being fetched Stefan Richter
2008-01-24 16:11         ` Jarod Wilson [this message]
2008-01-24 19:26           ` Jarod Wilson
2008-01-25 16:53             ` [PATCH 4/4 update] " Stefan Richter
2008-01-25 17:16               ` Jarod Wilson
2008-01-25 17:21                 ` Stefan Richter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4798B8BA.9090203@redhat.com \
    --to=jwilson@redhat.com \
    --cc=krh@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).