From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: [Regression] 2.6.24-git3: Major annoyance during suspend/hibernation on x86-64 (bisected)
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 20:40:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <479D3287.1050604@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200801280226.22013.rjw@sisk.pl>
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> No, this isn't the WARN_ON().
>
>> this does have the feel of being scheduling related, but are you
>> absolutely sure about the precise identity of the patch?
>
> Actually, not quite. That's why I have verified it and found that another
> patch is really responsible for the issue, namely:
>
> commit 82a1fcb90287052aabfa235e7ffc693ea003fe69
> Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> Date: Fri Jan 25 21:08:02 2008 +0100
>
> softlockup: automatically detect hung TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE tasks
Are you getting a bunch of prints from the softlockup detector in dmesg?
I wonder if the detector can detect a long timeout caused by suspend and
resume and if not is triggering false positives?
-- Steve
>
> Reverting this commit (it reverts with some minor modifications) fixes the
> problem for me.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-28 1:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-27 21:29 [Regression] 2.6.24-git3: Major annoyance during suspend/hibernation on x86-64 (bisected) Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-27 21:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-28 1:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-28 1:40 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2008-01-28 11:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-28 16:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-28 16:46 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-01-29 0:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-28 8:56 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-01-28 11:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-28 16:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-31 15:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-01-31 20:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-02-01 12:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-02-01 12:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-01 14:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-02-01 23:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-02-01 23:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-01 15:11 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-02-01 17:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-01 21:54 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-02-01 22:44 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-02-01 22:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-01 23:22 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-02-01 23:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-02 0:03 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-02-01 23:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=479D3287.1050604@redhat.com \
--to=srostedt@redhat.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox