From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>
To: Luotao Fu <l.fu@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
RT <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc8-rt1: Strange latencies on mpc5200 powerpc
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:38:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <479DF711.5090406@grandegger.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <479DF0A1.3000906@pengutronix.de>
Hi Fu,
Luotao Fu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I took some time today and went through Wolfgangs scenarios partly. Now
> some results from my side. I ran my tests on a 2.6.24-rt1
>
> Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> > I also did some more measurements and made, by chance, interesting
>> observations. I will summarize in more detail later on. Here are some
>> preliminary results. My high latencies of up to 570us (without latency
>> tracer) seem to be caused mainly by the following setting:
>>
>> CONFIG_RCU_TRACE=m
>>
>
> I also got high latencies without CONFIG_RCU_TRACE set at all. setting
> CONFIG_RCU_TRACE to y or m causes also high latency though in my test
> runs. Hence I doubt the rcu Tracer is really the problem.
>
> As I mentioned in my last mail. Only thing I could reproduce reliably is
> that the measurement results depend heavily on kind of the non-rt
> Workload. For with hackbench or cache calibrator I couldn't produce
> abnormal high latencies. Nor could I produce the hight latencies on a
> system booted via flash. Hence my suspects stays on the fec irq thread
> and filesystem access routines.
>
>> With CONFIG_NO_HZ=y or CONFIG_PPC_BESTCOMM_GEN_BD=y the latency
>> increases by approx. 100..150us, each.
>>
>
> Since I was producing high latencies independently from the rcu
> settings. I didn't spend a lot of time playing around with the GEN_BD
> and dynamic clock. All I can say is that disabling them also cause high
> latency. ;-) The average results don't differ significantly in my test
> runs.
In the meantime I have measured the impact more carefully and posted the
results to the list:
- CONFIG_RCU_TRACE or CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU_BOOST not set causes high
latencies up to 500..600us.
- CONFIG_NO_HZ=y increases the latency by 90 us, at least.
- CONFIG_PPC_BESTCOMM_GEN_BD=y seems not to harm.
Do you still get high latencies with:
CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU_BOOST=y
CONFIG_RCU_TRACE=y
CONFIG_NO_HZ is not set
With this setting I have not yet realized latencies > 150us. Could you
please give it a try? If I change one of the parameters above, latency
increases in short time.
Thanks.
Wolfgang.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-28 15:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-17 4:27 2.6.24-rc8-rt1 Steven Rostedt
2008-01-17 5:26 ` 2.6.24-rc8-rt1 Mark Knecht
2008-01-17 10:13 ` 2.6.24-rc8-rt1 Wolfgang Grandegger
2008-01-17 12:46 ` 2.6.24-rc8-rt1 Luotao Fu
2008-01-17 16:17 ` 2.6.24-rc8-rt1 Daniel Walker
2008-01-17 18:17 ` 2.6.24-rc8-rt1 Wolfgang Grandegger
2008-01-17 18:30 ` 2.6.24-rc8-rt1 Daniel Walker
2008-01-17 18:44 ` 2.6.24-rc8-rt1 Steven Rostedt
2008-01-17 18:45 ` 2.6.24-rc8-rt1 Steven Rostedt
2008-01-17 20:01 ` 2.6.24-rc8-rt1 Wolfgang Grandegger
2008-01-17 18:46 ` 2.6.24-rc8-rt1 Wolfgang Grandegger
2008-01-17 21:11 ` 2.6.24-rc8-rt1 Robert Schwebel
2008-01-17 21:36 ` 2.6.24-rc8-rt1 Wolfgang Grandegger
2008-01-23 14:53 ` 2.6.24-rc8-rt1: Strange latencies on mpc5200 powerpc Luotao Fu
2008-01-23 15:50 ` Daniel Walker
2008-01-23 16:36 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2008-01-24 10:53 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2008-01-28 15:11 ` Luotao Fu
2008-01-28 15:38 ` Wolfgang Grandegger [this message]
2008-01-29 12:13 ` 2.6.24-rc8-rt1: Strange latencies on mpc5200 powerpc - RCU issue? Luotao Fu
2008-01-29 13:38 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2008-01-30 1:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-01-30 8:18 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2008-01-30 10:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-01-30 10:45 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2008-01-30 10:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-01-30 11:15 ` Luotao Fu
2008-07-01 14:27 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2008-07-01 15:11 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-07-01 16:11 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2008-07-01 21:11 ` Luotao Fu
2008-07-02 11:03 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2008-07-06 0:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-07-06 9:41 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2008-07-08 15:08 ` Luotao Fu
2008-07-08 19:43 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2008-07-09 12:53 ` Luotao Fu
2008-07-09 13:15 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2008-07-09 14:52 ` Luotao Fu
2008-07-10 7:50 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2008-08-01 21:09 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-08-01 21:09 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-08-05 15:40 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2008-07-02 8:09 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2008-07-06 0:39 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-07-06 9:34 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2008-01-30 11:22 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2008-01-17 19:57 ` 2.6.24-rc8-rt1 Mariusz Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=479DF711.5090406@grandegger.com \
--to=wg@grandegger.com \
--cc=l.fu@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).