From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1754924AbYAaJSf@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754924AbYAaJSf (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 31 Jan 2008 04:18:35 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753595AbYAaJRv
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Thu, 31 Jan 2008 04:17:51 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:41459 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753033AbYAaJRt (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 31 Jan 2008 04:17:49 -0500
Message-ID: <47A19231.9030302@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 04:17:37 -0500
From: Chris Snook <csnook@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071115)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
       Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: about relocs.c on x86
References: <86802c440801310007oe8693c7q177d41a87c27ca7@mail.gmail.com>	 <47A187DB.5010201@redhat.com> <86802c440801310113s4f792b70le8377440078125f4@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <86802c440801310113s4f792b70le8377440078125f4@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Jan 31, 2008 12:33 AM, Chris Snook <csnook@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>> why not rename relocs.c to relocs_32.c?
>> Because we're trying to get rid of all the _32 and _64 files?
> 
> but that file is not need for x86_64

Which means there's no conflict with any 64-bit code, and thus no reason 
to break it out into a _32 file.

	-- Chris