From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, Linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: swsusp on an AMD x2-64, 2.6.24: regression?
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 18:04:50 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47A33512.8050401@msgid.tls.msk.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200802011225.11571.rjw@sisk.pl>
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, 1 of February 2008, Michael Tokarev wrote:
[]
>> no_console_suspend it is. Tried that, the "S|" thing is still
>> here, but instead of "Suspending console(s)" it now shows
>> progress of suspending other devices. The end result is
>> the same - finally it stops and sits here ad infinitum.
>
> I guess it's a special variation of
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9528
>
> Please try to hibernate in the shutdown mode (ie. echo
> "shutdown" into /sys/power/disk before hibernation).
Hmm. A very obscure thing - that bug, that is.
Tried "shutdown" - it works - even with all the other
"fancy" stuff like highres timers, cpufreq et al. And
it resumes correctly as well.
After reading all the stuff attached to that bugreport,
I also tried removing ohci_hcd - it also works just fine
(had to do it in one line --
rmmod ohci-hcd; sleep 5; echo disk > /sys/power/state
-- because I don't have non-USB keyboard handy :)
What I also noticied is that at least twice while doing
all the experiments, I've seen a message similar to (off
memory):
ohci_hcd: unlink after non-IRQ - controller is probably using the wrong IRQ
this is done when no_console_suspend is enabled - during
the final stage of suspend, when the kernel prints messages
about disabling acpi devices. I can't reproduce it easily,
but it happened at least twice with the same kernel configuration
(i tried different options, many variations, recompiling and
reinstalling kernel each time).
In any way, this is definitely progress, and that bug
seems to be the same as I'm seeing here.
Now... I see there's a new BIOS for this mobo available
(it's ASUS M2NPV-VM motherboard, Geforce6150/Nforce430(?)),
which is more recent compared with what I have here. Trying
it now (will try to reflash it without a floppy - it turns
out to be quite.. challenging task ;)
Thanks!
/mjt
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-01 15:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-31 21:41 swsusp on an AMD x2-64, 2.6.24: regression? Michael Tokarev
2008-01-31 23:12 ` Pavel Machek
2008-02-01 10:16 ` Michael Tokarev
2008-02-01 11:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-02-01 15:04 ` Michael Tokarev [this message]
2008-02-01 15:28 ` Michael Tokarev
2008-02-01 12:44 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47A33512.8050401@msgid.tls.msk.ru \
--to=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox