Re: [Scst-devel] Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel

Chris Weiss
2008-02-05T02:07:19Z

On Feb 4, 2008 11:30 AM, Douglas Gilbert <dougg@torque.net> wrote:
> Alan Cox wrote:
> >> better. So for example, I personally suspect that ATA-over-ethernet is way
> >> better than some crazy SCSI-over-TCP crap, but I'm biased for simple and
> >> low-level, and against those crazy SCSI people to begin with.
> >
> > Current ATAoE isn't. It can't support NCQ. A variant that did NCQ and IP
> > would probably trash iSCSI for latency if nothing else.
>
> And a variant that doesn't do ATA or IP:
> http://www.fcoe.com/
>

however, and interestingly enough, the open-fcoe software target
depends on scst (for now anyway)