From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760712AbYBEUNS (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Feb 2008 15:13:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757856AbYBEUNK (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Feb 2008 15:13:10 -0500 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:38523 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754585AbYBEUNJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Feb 2008 15:13:09 -0500 Message-ID: <47A8C336.1010107@zytor.com> Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 12:12:38 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071115) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linus Torvalds CC: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [git pull] x86 updates References: <20080204161219.GA8092@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Ingo, Thomas, > should we not do this? > > Otherwise, it seems we generate a section that isn't allocated? > > I think toolchain should add the right flags automatically for sections > that start with ".[ro]data" and ".text", but not for the kernel-specific > ".init.*" sections. > > Linus > > --- > arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S b/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S > index 4f283ad..d16d7b8 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S > @@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ ENTRY(secondary_startup_64) > > /* SMP bootup changes these two */ > #ifndef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU > - .pushsection .init.data > + .pushsection .init.data,"aw" > #endif > .align 8 > .globl initial_code I definitely think we should add flags where applicable. -hpa