From: Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@wpkg.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: why kexec insists on syncing with recent kernels?
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 15:13:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47AB120A.1000600@wpkg.org> (raw)
According to kernel/kexec.c:
* kexec does not sync, or unmount filesystems so if you need
* that to happen you need to do that yourself.
I saw this was true with 2.6.18 kernel (i.e., it didn't sync), but kexec
syncs with recent kernels (I checked 2.6.23.14 and 2.6.24):
# kexec -e
md: stopping all md devices
sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb] Synchronizing SCSI cache
With kexec on 2.6.18 it was executing a loaded kernel immediately.
Generally, it's a good thing to sync before jumping into a new kernel,
but it breaks my setup here after upgrading from 2.6.18 to 2.6.24.
Why?
I have a couple of diskless (iSCSI-boot) machines with a buggy BIOS (old
Supermicro P4SBR/P4SBE) which randomly freeze after rebooting (the
machine shuts down just fine, but instead of booting again, showing BIOS
bootup messages etc. you can just see blank screen).
Therefore, I use kexec as a workaround for this rebooting problem.
The way kexec works now makes rebooting unreliable again:
- network interfaces are brought down,
- kernel tries to sync - it never will, as we're booted off network,
which is down
Any ideas why kexec insists on syncing?
--
Tomasz Chmielewski
http://blog.wpkg.org
next reply other threads:[~2008-02-07 14:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-07 14:13 Tomasz Chmielewski [this message]
2008-02-07 16:37 ` why kexec insists on syncing with recent kernels? Vivek Goyal
2008-02-07 16:59 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2008-02-08 16:04 ` Vivek Goyal
2008-02-08 17:04 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-02-08 17:19 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2008-02-08 17:26 ` Vivek Goyal
2008-02-11 12:36 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-02-08 8:53 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47AB120A.1000600@wpkg.org \
--to=mangoo@wpkg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox