From: Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, john.ronciak@intel.com,
jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com,
auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com
Subject: Re: e1000 1sec latency problem
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 08:58:19 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47AB38AB.8050001@qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080207141718.GA2030@elf.ucw.cz>
Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have the famous e1000 latency problems:
>
> 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=68 ttl=56 time=351.9 ms
> 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=69 ttl=56 time=209.2 ms
> 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=70 ttl=56 time=1004.1 ms
> 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=71 ttl=56 time=308.9 ms
> 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=72 ttl=56 time=305.4 ms
> 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=73 ttl=56 time=9.8 ms
> 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=74 ttl=56 time=3.7 ms
>
> ...and they are still there in 2.6.25-git0. I had ethernet EEPROM
> checksum problems, which I fixed by the update, but problems are not
> gone.
>
> irqpoll helps.
>
> nosmp (which implies XT-PIC is being used) does not help.
>
> 16: 1925 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi ahci, yenta, uhci_hcd:usb2, eth0
>
> Booting kernel with nosmp/ no yenta, no usb does not help.
>
> Hmm, as expected, interrupt load on ahci (find /) makes latencies go
> away.
>
> It should be easily reproducible on x60 with latest bios, it is 100%
> reproducible for me...
So you don't think it's related to the interrupt coalescing by any chance ?
I'd suggest to try and disable the coalescing and see if it makes any difference.
We've had lots of issues with coalescing misbehavior. Not this bad (ie 1 second) though.
Add this to modprobe.conf and reload e1000 module
options e1000 RxIntDelay=0,0 RxAbsIntDelay=0,0 InterruptThrottleRate=0,0 TxIntDelay=0,0 TxAbsIntDelay=0,0
Max
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-07 16:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-07 14:17 e1000 1sec latency problem Pavel Machek
2008-02-07 16:58 ` Max Krasnyansky [this message]
2008-02-07 17:25 ` [E1000-devel] " Kok, Auke
2008-02-07 18:06 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-02-07 18:12 ` Kok, Auke
2008-02-07 18:30 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-02-07 18:40 ` Kok, Auke
2008-02-07 18:55 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-02-07 18:17 ` Kok, Auke
2008-02-07 22:24 ` Pavel Machek
2008-02-07 22:32 ` Kok, Auke
2008-02-07 22:37 ` Pavel Machek
2008-02-07 23:12 ` Kok, Auke
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-02-07 22:31 Martin Rogge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47AB38AB.8050001@qualcomm.com \
--to=maxk@qualcomm.com \
--cc=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
--cc=e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=john.ronciak@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox