From: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>
To: Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
john.ronciak@intel.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] e1000 1sec latency problem
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 10:12:03 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47AB49F3.301@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47AB48B0.10403@qualcomm.com>
Max Krasnyansky wrote:
> Kok, Auke wrote:
>> Max Krasnyansky wrote:
>>> So you don't think it's related to the interrupt coalescing by any chance ?
>>> I'd suggest to try and disable the coalescing and see if it makes any difference.
>>> We've had lots of issues with coalescing misbehavior. Not this bad (ie 1 second) though.
>>>
>>> Add this to modprobe.conf and reload e1000 module
>>>
>>> options e1000 RxIntDelay=0,0 RxAbsIntDelay=0,0 InterruptThrottleRate=0,0 TxIntDelay=0,0 TxAbsIntDelay=0,0
>> that can't be the problem. irq moderation would only account for 2-3ms variance
>> maximum.
> Oh, I've definitely seen worse than that. Not as bad as a 1second though. Plus you're talking
> about the case when coalescing logic is working as designed ;-). What if there is some kind of
> bug where timer did not expire or something.
we don't use a software timer in e1000 irq coalescing/moderation, it's all in
hardware, so we don't have that problem at all. And I certainly have never seen
anything you are referring to with e1000 hardware, and I do not know of any bug
related to this.
are you maybe confused with other hardware?
feel free to demonstrate an example...
Cheers,
Auke
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-07 18:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-07 14:17 e1000 1sec latency problem Pavel Machek
2008-02-07 16:58 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-02-07 17:25 ` [E1000-devel] " Kok, Auke
2008-02-07 18:06 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-02-07 18:12 ` Kok, Auke [this message]
2008-02-07 18:30 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-02-07 18:40 ` Kok, Auke
2008-02-07 18:55 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-02-07 18:17 ` Kok, Auke
2008-02-07 22:24 ` Pavel Machek
2008-02-07 22:32 ` Kok, Auke
2008-02-07 22:37 ` Pavel Machek
2008-02-07 23:12 ` Kok, Auke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47AB49F3.301@intel.com \
--to=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
--cc=e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=john.ronciak@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxk@qualcomm.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox