public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] quota: Turn quotas off when remounting read-only
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 22:27:27 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47AB5B9F.8090302@msgid.tls.msk.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080207103655.14ce8512.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 15:37:21 +0100 Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote:
> 
>> Turn off quotas before filesystem is remounted read only. Otherwise quota will
>> try to write to read-only filesystem which does no good... We could also just
>> refuse to remount ro when quota is enabled but turning quota off is consistent
>> with what we do on umount.

[a nice one-liner snipped]

> Cool.  And this is applicable to 2.6.23, 2.6.22 and even earlier, isn't it?

Provided the amount of time this issue exists, I don't think it's worth
to push it to -stable.  It's an oooooooold, issue, which happens quite
rarely, and no one bothered to report it so far...  But it's not my
call... ;)

But...  I'm thinking about this scenario:

 # mount /data
 # quotaon /data
 (some maintenance stuff to be planned)
 # mount -o remount,ro /data
 (do backup etc)
 # mount -r remount,rw /data

at this point, it's expected that quota on /data is enabled.
After this patch, it's not anymore...

I think it's more usual scenario than mine (umount instead of
remount-rw).  And this change will break it.  So I'm not sure
what really to do here.  Probably refusing remount-ro if quota
is on is better...  it's annoying for sure, but at least it's
explicit, and avoids the handg too.

/mjt

  reply	other threads:[~2008-02-07 19:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-07 14:37 [PATCH] quota: Turn quotas off when remounting read-only Jan Kara
2008-02-07 18:36 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-07 19:27   ` Michael Tokarev [this message]
2008-02-11 12:39     ` Jan Kara
2008-02-15 14:10       ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-02-15 14:21         ` Michael Tokarev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47AB5B9F.8090302@msgid.tls.msk.ru \
    --to=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox