From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>
Subject: Re: [17/19] ftrace: dynamic enabling/disabling of function calls
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:35:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47B06B4E.1010704@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080210072109.GR4100@elte.hu>
Hi Ingo and Steven,
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
>
> This patch adds a feature to dynamically replace the ftrace code
> with the jmps to allow a kernel with ftrace configured to run
> as fast as it can without it configured.
>
> The way this works, is on bootup, a ftrace function is registered
> to record the instruction pointer of all places that call the
> function.
>
> Later, a kthread is awoken once a second that performs a stop_machine,
> and replaces all the code that was called with a jmp over the call
> to ftrace. It only replaces what was found the previous time.
>
> e.g.
>
> call ftrace /* 5 bytes */
>
> is replaced with
>
> jmp 3f /* jmp is 2 bytes and we jump 3 forward */
> 3:
>
> When we want to enable ftrace for function tracing, the IP recording
> is removed, and stop_machine is called again to replace all the locations
> of that were recorded back to the call of ftrace. When it is disabled,
> we replace the code back to the jmp.
>
> Allocation is done by the kthread. If the ftrace recording function is
> called, and we don't have any record slots available, then we simply
> skip that call. Once a second a new page (if needed) is allocated for
> recording new ftrace function calls. A large batch is allocated at
> boot up to get most of the calls there.
>
> Because we do this via stop_machine, we don't have to worry about another
> CPU executing a ftrace call as we modify it. But we do need to worry
> about NMI's so all functions that might be called via nmi must be
> annotated with notrace_nmi. When this code is configured in, the NMI code
> will not call notrace.
I'd like to suggest that you can use djprobe-like solution here to eliminate
stop_machine.
The djprobe makes a bypass over that call instruction by using a kprobe,
and after replacing the call instruction, you can safely remove the bypass.
Here is an ols paper about djprobe.
http://www.kernel.org/doc/ols/2007/ols2007v1-pages-189-200.pdf
Thank you,
--
Masami Hiramatsu
Software Engineer
Hitachi Computer Products (America) Inc.
Software Solutions Division
e-mail: mhiramat@redhat.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-11 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-10 7:21 [17/19] ftrace: dynamic enabling/disabling of function calls Ingo Molnar
2008-02-11 15:35 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2008-02-11 16:31 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47B06B4E.1010704@redhat.com \
--to=mhiramat@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox