From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1765877AbYBMPez (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:34:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756181AbYBMPeq (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:34:46 -0500 Received: from sd-green-bigip-145.dreamhost.com ([208.97.132.145]:60218 "EHLO spunkymail-a10.g.dreamhost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755963AbYBMPep (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:34:45 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 42845 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:34:45 EST Message-ID: <47B30E11.2080903@sdiz.net> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 23:34:41 +0800 From: SDiZ User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080110) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marcel Holtmann Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][BLUETOOTH] add HCI_BROKEN_ISOC for 0e5e:6622 (bugzilla #9027) References: <47B266AE.3040908@sdiz.net> <1202898692.7664.369.camel@violet> In-Reply-To: <1202898692.7664.369.camel@violet> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Big5-HKSCS Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > Hi, > >> This patch fix bugzilla #9027. >> ``Syslog flooded with "hci_scodata_packet: hci0 SCO packet for unknown >> connection handle 92" message" >> >> see http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9027 >> > > when we get the content of /proc/bus/usb/devices for this one. Do you > have the manufacturer name of it or at least an idea which kind of > device this is. Check "hciconfig hci0 version". > It have no text on the chips and package, so I don't know the manufacturer name. /proc/bus/usb/devices shows: T: Bus=01 Lev=01 Prnt=01 Port=01 Cnt=01 Dev#= 2 Spd=12 MxCh= 0 D: Ver= 1.10 Cls=e0(unk. ) Sub=01 Prot=01 MxPS=16 #Cfgs= 1 P: Vendor=0e5e ProdID=6622 Rev= 1.34 C:* #Ifs= 2 Cfg#= 1 Atr=80 MxPwr=100mA I:* If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 3 Cls=e0(unk. ) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=hci_usb E: Ad=81(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS= 16 Ivl=1ms E: Ad=82(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 64 Ivl=0ms E: Ad=02(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 64 Ivl=0ms I: If#= 1 Alt= 0 #EPs= 2 Cls=e0(unk. ) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=hci_usb E: Ad=83(I) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS= 0 Ivl=1ms E: Ad=03(O) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS= 0 Ivl=1ms I: If#= 1 Alt= 1 #EPs= 2 Cls=e0(unk. ) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=hci_usb E: Ad=83(I) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS= 9 Ivl=1ms E: Ad=03(O) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS= 9 Ivl=1ms I:* If#= 1 Alt= 2 #EPs= 2 Cls=e0(unk. ) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=hci_usb E: Ad=83(I) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS= 17 Ivl=1ms E: Ad=03(O) Atr=01(Isoc) MxPS= 17 Ivl=1ms > Dave, I don't think this is a broken dongle. I think he hits the case of > eSCO versus SCO connection (the fallback to SCO case). I am working on > the proper fix for that, but that is not as simple as it seems. > > Regards > > Marcel > Regards, Yuk-Pong, Cheng (SDiZ)