From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764925AbYBMShi (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:37:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752790AbYBMSha (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:37:30 -0500 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:53784 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752021AbYBMSh3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:37:29 -0500 Message-ID: <47B338E2.20409@zytor.com> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:37:22 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071115) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christian Borntraeger CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: "avoid overflows in kernel/time" breakes my ondemand scheduler References: <200802130938.50749.borntraeger@de.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <200802130938.50749.borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Christian Borntraeger wrote: > Hello H. Peter, > > the patch "avoid overflows in kernel/time" makes the ondemand cpufreq > scheduler unusable. It looks like the cpufreq scheduler takes minutes to > react on load changes. > > I looked at the patch but did not found an obvious problem. Reverting this > patch seems to fix the problem. > > Do you have any ideas? > > Christian Yes, a patch has already been sent upstream. -hpa