From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756803AbYBPKKd (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Feb 2008 05:10:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752965AbYBPKKZ (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Feb 2008 05:10:25 -0500 Received: from e28smtp05.in.ibm.com ([59.145.155.5]:38578 "EHLO e28esmtp05.in.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752857AbYBPKKY (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Feb 2008 05:10:24 -0500 Message-ID: <47B6B5CA.7040201@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 15:37:06 +0530 From: Balbir Singh Reply-To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com Organization: IBM User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071115) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Menage CC: balbir@in.ibm.com, pj@sgi.com, Pavel Emelianov , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/7] CGroup API: Add cgroup.api control file References: <20080215204418.535025000@menage.corp.google.com> <20080215204820.734926000@menage.corp.google.com> In-Reply-To: <20080215204820.734926000@menage.corp.google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Paul Menage wrote: Hi, Paul, Do we need to use a cgroup.api file? Why not keep up to date documentation and get users to use that. I fear that, cgroup.api will not be kept up-to-date, leading to confusion. Why should the kernel carry so much of documentation in the image as strings? -- Warm Regards, Balbir Singh Linux Technology Center IBM, ISTL