From: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
To: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
andrew.grover@intel.com, paul.s.diefenbaugh@intel.com,
linux@brodo.de, anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com, lenb@kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] remove goto statement
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 23:07:54 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47BA39FA.7050102@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47BA2E93.4040002@cn.fujitsu.com>
Li Zefan wrote:
> Glauber Costa 写道:
>> This patch removes goto statements in favour of plain returns
>> in places that had nothing left behind that would justify
>> such construction
>> ---
>> drivers/acpi/processor_core.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
>> index 06a230a..70f62b6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
>> @@ -651,7 +651,7 @@ static int __cpuinit acpi_processor_star
>>
>> result = acpi_processor_add_fs(device);
>> if (result)
>> - goto end;
>> + return result;
>>
>> status = acpi_install_notify_handler(pr->handle, ACPI_DEVICE_NOTIFY,
>> acpi_processor_notify, pr);
>> @@ -675,7 +675,7 @@ #endif
>> "%s is registered as cooling_device%d\n",
>> device->dev.bus_id, cdev->id);
>> else
>> - goto end;
>> + return result;
>>
>> result = sysfs_create_link(&device->dev.kobj, &cdev->device.kobj,
>> "thermal_cooling");
>
> Seems you forgot to remove the 'end' label ?
yes, in fact, thanks for pointing.
However, the patches are as split up as I could do, and it should not
affect the others. I can re send this one, the whole series, or
whatever, depending on what the maintainer wants.
So, what's gonna be?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-19 2:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-18 20:56 [PATCH 1/4] make cdev attribuition the last step Glauber Costa
2008-02-18 20:56 ` [PATCH 2/4] use pr->cdev as a condition for cleanup Glauber Costa
2008-02-18 20:56 ` [PATCH 3/4] provide error handling for unclean objects Glauber Costa
2008-02-18 20:56 ` [PATCH 4/4] remove goto statement Glauber Costa
2008-02-19 1:19 ` Li Zefan
2008-02-19 2:07 ` Glauber Costa [this message]
2008-02-19 2:22 ` Li Zefan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47BA39FA.7050102@redhat.com \
--to=gcosta@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrew.grover@intel.com \
--cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@brodo.de \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=paul.s.diefenbaugh@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox