From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: Max Krasnyanskiy <maxk@qualcomm.com>
Cc: rusty@rustcorp.com.au, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Module loading/unloading and "The Stop Machine"
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:38:54 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47BE27AE.8050009@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47BE245F.3030809@qualcomm.com>
Max Krasnyanskiy wrote:
> Thanks for the info. I guess I missed that from the code. In any case
> that seems like a pretty heavy refcounting mechanism. In a sense that
> every time something is loaded or unloaded entire machine freezes,
> potentially for several milliseconds. Normally it's not a big deal. But
> once you get more and more CPUs and/or start using realtime apps this
> becomes a big deal.
Module loading doesn't involve stop_machine last time I checked. It's a
big deal when unloading a module but it's actually a very good trade off
because it makes much hotter path (module_get/put) much cheaper. If
your application can't stand stop_machine, simply don't unload a module.
> And it's plain broken for the use case that I mentioned
> during CPU isolation discussions. ie When user-space thread(s) prevent
> stopmachine kthread from running, in which
> case machine simply hangs until those user-space threads exit.
This I don't know nothing about. :-)
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-22 1:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-08 2:38 Module loading/unloading and "The Stop Machine" Max Krasnyansky
2008-02-08 23:11 ` Max Krasnyanskiy
2008-02-14 4:02 ` Tejun Heo
2008-02-22 1:24 ` Max Krasnyanskiy
2008-02-22 1:38 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2008-02-22 1:47 ` Max Krasnyanskiy
2008-02-22 1:59 ` Tejun Heo
2008-02-22 2:16 ` Max Krasnyanskiy
2008-02-22 11:53 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-22 22:41 ` Max Krasnyanskiy
2008-03-04 1:21 ` Rusty Russell
2008-02-14 5:02 ` Jike Song
2008-02-14 5:38 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-04 3:51 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47BE27AE.8050009@gmail.com \
--to=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxk@qualcomm.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox