From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
xfs@oss.sgi.com, johannes@sipsolutions.net,
linux-kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [xfs-masters] Re: filesystem corruption on xfs after 2.6.25-rc1 (bisected, powerpc related?)
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 12:05:59 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47C47127.7040700@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080226114419.GA5353@soziologie.ch>
Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 01:13:56AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 26 of February 2008, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:52:56AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>>>> I'm not suggesting a partial revert; I just wonder which part of the
>>>>> change is causing the problem, as part of the debugging process.
>
> I debuged this a bit further by testing the 4 changed functions
> individually. The problem only occurs with the new version of
> xfs_lowbit64.
FWIW, Dave & I did some testing/debugging on 32-bit powerpc, and it is
indeed only xfs_lowbit64 which is doing the wrong thing on that arch,
because generic find_next_bit is doing the wrong thing on big-endian
32-bit systems, for sizes > 32 bits, near as I can tell.
Rather than reverting it all, I think just changing xfs_lowbit64 back to:
int
xfs_lowbit64(
__uint64_t v)
{
__uint32_t w = (__uint32_t)v;
int n = 0;
if (w) { /* lower bits */
n = ffs(w);
} else { /* upper bits */
w = (__uint32_t)(v >> 32);
if (w && (n = ffs(w)))
n += 32;
}
return n - 1;
}
for now should fix it (this is essentially just ffs64())
-Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-26 20:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-25 11:23 filesystem corruption on xfs after 2.6.25-rc1 (bisected, powerpc related?) Gaudenz Steinlin
2008-02-25 11:34 ` Johannes Berg
2008-02-25 18:15 ` [xfs-masters] " Eric Sandeen
2008-02-25 23:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-02-25 23:48 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-02-25 23:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-02-25 23:57 ` [xfs-masters] " Christoph Hellwig
2008-02-26 0:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-02-26 7:34 ` Gaudenz Steinlin
2008-02-26 11:44 ` Gaudenz Steinlin
2008-02-26 18:11 ` Johannes Berg
2008-02-28 14:40 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-02-26 20:05 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2008-02-26 20:59 ` Mark Goodwin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47C47127.7040700@sandeen.net \
--to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox