From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1757665AbYB1BqG@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1757665AbYB1BqG (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:46:06 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753179AbYB1Bpx
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:45:53 -0500
Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.254]:6282 "EHLO
	wolverine01.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1750918AbYB1Bpw (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:45:52 -0500
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5200,2160,5239"; a="958645"
Message-ID: <47C6124E.6020305@qualcomm.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:45:50 -0800
From: Max Krasnyanskiy <maxk@qualcomm.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071115)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
CC: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, mingo@elte.hu,
       tglx@linutronix.de, oleg@tv-sign.ru, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/4] cpuset: system sets
References: <20080227222103.673194000@chello.nl> <20080227222542.311184000@chello.nl> <47C5F7D6.2000203@qualcomm.com> <20080227181129.59086769.pj@sgi.com> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0802271928430.9072@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0802271928430.9072@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2008, Paul Jackson wrote:
> 
>> Max wrote:
>>> Hmm, shouldn't patches be sent inline ?
>> Huh?  Peter's patches were inline for me ... odd.
>>
> 
> Me too.
> 
> Max, what email client are you using?

Thunderbird. The patches were actually attached. Thunderbird does show
them inline but when you hit reply it's an empty message.

Max