From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759896AbYB1MNY (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Feb 2008 07:13:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758113AbYB1MNR (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Feb 2008 07:13:17 -0500 Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([75.180.132.121]:61029 "EHLO cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757973AbYB1MNQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Feb 2008 07:13:16 -0500 Message-ID: <47C6A516.4070707@cfl.rr.com> Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 07:12:06 -0500 From: Mark Hounschell User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20070801) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Zijlstra CC: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Oleg Nesterov , Steven Rostedt , Paul Jackson , Max Krasnyanskiy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "markh@compro.net >> Mark Hounschell" Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/4] CPUSET driven CPU isolation References: <20080227222103.673194000@chello.nl> In-Reply-To: <20080227222103.673194000@chello.nl> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Peter Zijlstra wrote: > My vision on the direction we should take wrt cpu isolation. > > Next on the list would be figuring out a nice solution to the workqueue > flush issue. > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > Is it now the intent, not only that I have to enable cpusets in the kernel but I will also have to use them in userland to take advantage of this. And hot-plug too?? Can I predict that in the future that userland sched_setaffinity will be taken away also and be forced to use cpusets? And hot-plug too?? Mark