From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762714AbYB1ThA (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:37:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1762188AbYB1Tgs (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:36:48 -0500 Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.254]:9945 "EHLO wolverine01.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758079AbYB1Tgq (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:36:46 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5200,2160,5241"; a="986491" Message-ID: <47C70D49.2060909@qualcomm.com> Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 11:36:41 -0800 From: Max Krasnyansky User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071115) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Zijlstra CC: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Oleg Nesterov , Steven Rostedt , Paul Jackson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/4] sched: remove isolcpus References: <20080227222103.673194000@chello.nl> <20080227222542.056473000@chello.nl> <47C5F8E0.3060708@qualcomm.com> <1204193985.6243.27.camel@lappy> In-Reply-To: <1204193985.6243.27.camel@lappy> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 15:57 -0800, Max Krasnyanskiy wrote: >> Peter Zijlstra wrote: >> >>> cpu isolation doesn't offer anything over cpusets, hence remove it. >> Works for me. That's what I suggested in my reply to your comments. >> Here is the quote from the previous thread: > > Dude, I've been pushing a cpuset interface from the get go. Right. And you ended up with exact same solution for the map that represents the CPUs that are isolated (or not isolated). I was just saying that I was asking people how to integrate cpu_isolated_map with cpusets, none of you guys acked or nacked it. Max