From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758763AbYB2MD1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Feb 2008 07:03:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753820AbYB2MDS (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Feb 2008 07:03:18 -0500 Received: from mail.amln.net ([88.203.210.2]:33076 "EHLO neon.bastun.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753504AbYB2MDR (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Feb 2008 07:03:17 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 1537 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 07:03:17 EST Message-ID: <47C7EEAC.7010907@amln.net> Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:38:20 +0200 From: Xpl++ User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.5.0.14 (Windows/20071210) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Menage CC: Linux Containers , LKML , Balbir Singh , Peter Zijlstra , Pavel Emelianov , Paul Jackson , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [RFC] Prefixing cgroup generic control filenames with "cgroup." References: <6599ad830802281314s25c033d6tc021725ae28aef8d@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6599ad830802281314s25c033d6tc021725ae28aef8d@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Paul Menage ??????: > ... > > A compromise might be to keep "tasks" unprefixed, and say that future > names get the "cgroup." prefix; in this case I'd be inclined to add > the prefix to notify_on_release and release_agent on the grounds that > there's much less chance of breaking anyone with those files since (I > suspect) they're much less used. > This makes most sense to me. It won't break any existing software (most likely) while it seems reasonable to leave 'tasks' unprefixed as this is something that any software using any subsystem of cgroup would be using anyway and it is not that much associated with a particulat subsystem. Regards, Peter Litov.