Re: [PATCH 2.6.25] module: allow ndiswrapper to use GPL-only symbols

Chris Friesen
2008-02-29T16:56:21Z

Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, Pavel Roskin wrote:
>
>>>I'm not seeing why ndiswrapper should be treated separately.
>>
>>It is already treated separately, and has been for a long time.
>
>
> No, I mean "separately from the thing it loads".
>
> It loads non-GPL code, it is non-GPL.

But the GPL only applies to derivative works. Given that ndiswrapper
loads binaries designed for another OS, doesn't that mean that it is
unlikely that the binaries would be impacted by the GPL?

So the portion that is a derivative work (ndiswrapper itself) is GPL,
and it loads something that is clearly not a derivative work. From a
licensing standpoint how is this different than an open-source driver
loading a proprietary firmware?

Once ndiswrapper loads the binary blob the kernel should be considered
tainted from a debuggability standpoint, but I have some sympathy for an
argument suggesting that ndiswrapper should be able to use GPLONLY symbols.

Chris