From: Allan Menezes <amenezes007@sympatico.ca>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: HPL Benchmark performance degradation of kernel 2.6.24.3 vs 2.6.23.14
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2008 00:34:24 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47CA3C60.8080402@sympatico.ca> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1395 bytes --]
Hi,
I have a five node intel Q6600 quad core cluster and I benchmarked
it with open source open mpi software using fc8 and it's supplied
kernels recompiled and that of kernel.org with kernel 2.6.23.14 and
2.6.24.3.
With GotoBlas v 1.24 and open mpi beta both cases (v 1.3a) for kernels
2.6.23.14 with web100 i get 158GFlops.
But when i recompile with web100 for kernel 2.6.24 / without web100 and
having 6gig DDR2800MHz ram on each node i get only 28GFLOPS AND
22GFLOPS for 5 nodes whereas with or without web 100 for kernel
2.6.23.14 i get 156-8 GfLOPS. wITH OR WITHOUT web 100 i get for kernel
2.6.24.3 22- 28 Gflops for 5 nodes.!
Why is there a performance drop in kernel 2.6.24.3 All else hardware is
the same!
For inter node communication i use three pci express gig eth cards ( 2
intel and one syskonnect ) per node and using nptcp of netpipe their
performance of intel and syskonnect cards in both kernels measured point
to point is 880MBPS approx for all three cards with measured using
netpipe for tcp with kernel 2.6.24.3 and 2.6.23.14 . I am also using
three switches gigabit with high bisection b/w for these eth cards
(copper) with 3 different subnets
Yet I am getting a substantial performance drop keeping the hardware and
openmpi and hpl and gotoblas same. Can some one help me figure out why?
Please find attached my kernel's .config
Cheers,
Allan Menezes
[-- Attachment #2: .config --]
[-- Type: application/xml, Size: 63826 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2008-03-02 5:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-02 5:34 Allan Menezes [this message]
2008-03-02 18:48 ` HPL Benchmark performance degradation of kernel 2.6.24.3 vs 2.6.23.14 Eric Dumazet
2008-03-02 19:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-02 20:07 ` Roger Heflin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47CA3C60.8080402@sympatico.ca \
--to=amenezes007@sympatico.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox