From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761625AbYCCKBr (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Mar 2008 05:01:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756391AbYCCKB1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Mar 2008 05:01:27 -0500 Received: from E23SMTP06.au.ibm.com ([202.81.18.175]:43903 "EHLO e23smtp06.au.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753671AbYCCKB0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Mar 2008 05:01:26 -0500 Message-ID: <47CBCC01.6080504@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 15:29:29 +0530 From: Balbir Singh Reply-To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com Organization: IBM User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071115) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Menage CC: serge@hallyn.com, Andrew Morton , containers@lists.osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, xemul@openvz.org, pj@sgi.com Subject: Re: [RFC] Prefixing cgroup generic control filenames with "cgroup." References: <6599ad830802281314s25c033d6tc021725ae28aef8d@mail.gmail.com> <20080228132142.4d4b1eef.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <6599ad830802281328q162d0585v3ac6b45a119a4a05@mail.gmail.com> <20080228213319.GC1232@vino.hallyn.com> <6599ad830802281406s512ee32bkeb2b0387a7737a87@mail.gmail.com> <6599ad830803030038p2d81883bu895260a96fedaec6@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6599ad830803030038p2d81883bu895260a96fedaec6@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Paul Menage wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Paul Menage wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 1:33 PM, wrote: >> > >> > You said the set of files belong to cgroup itself is likely to increase >> > - do you have some candidates in mind? >> >> Nothing concrete right now. One example that I already proposed was >> the "cgroup.api" file but that's shelved for now, until such time as I >> actually propose the binary API that it was intended to help support. >> > > One likely new file that people agreed a while ago could be useful > would be a "procs" file, similar to "tasks", but acting (and > reporting) on thread groups rather than individual tasks. > > Paul Yes, I remember this. This feature would be extremely useful. -- Warm Regards, Balbir Singh Linux Technology Center IBM, ISTL