From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
To: "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@suse.de>,
"Kristian Høgsberg" <krh@bitplanet.net>
Cc: linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firewire: reread config ROM when device reset the bus
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 19:35:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47CC44DB.1060203@s5r6.in-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47CC3C48.1020306@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
I wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 11:51 AM, Stefan Richter
>> <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de> wrote:
[...rewriting data of a device with children devices whose driver probe
accesses these data...]
>>> Maybe I should rather use fw-device.c::idr_rwsem instead of device.sem,
>>> to have better control over who takes the mutex when. Could also be a
>>> new dedicated mutex but we don't want to end up with too many of
>>> them...
[...]
> Ah, wait, there is a 3rd reader: sbp2_probe's sbp2_scan_unit_dir. So,
> using dev->sem is actually the nicest way for now.
Or not. The necessary protection for this and other driver->probe()s
would be the device->parent.sem, not the device->sem itself. There seem
to be several ways how a driver probe may be entered (adding a device
when the driver is already there; attaching a driver when the device is
already there...) and I am not sure whether all these paths take the
device->parent.sem around the probe. It doesn't seem to be always the case.
Greg, can you comment on this?
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--- --== ---==
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-03 18:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-02 18:35 [PATCH] firewire: replace static ROM cache by allocated cache Stefan Richter
2008-03-03 0:48 ` [PATCH] firewire: reread config ROM when device reset the bus Stefan Richter
2008-03-03 16:17 ` Kristian Høgsberg
2008-03-03 16:51 ` Stefan Richter
2008-03-03 17:28 ` Kristian Høgsberg
2008-03-03 17:58 ` Stefan Richter
2008-03-03 18:35 ` Stefan Richter [this message]
2008-03-04 5:54 ` Greg KH
2008-03-04 8:39 ` Stefan Richter
2008-03-05 0:34 ` [PATCH update] " Stefan Richter
2008-03-05 0:48 ` Stefan Richter
2008-03-05 23:53 ` Stefan Richter
2008-03-06 1:25 ` Stefan Richter
2008-03-03 20:28 ` [PATCH] " Jarod Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47CC44DB.1060203@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
--to=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=krh@bitplanet.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox